Anything that is eternal cannot have been created. All of the truths of mathematics are analytic, and that means they are eternal: they were defined before anyone was around to define them. They are immutable, perfect Platonic truths that are true now, will be true tomorrow and true an infinite number of years from now, just as they were true an infinite number of years ago. It is therefore impossible that any "Creator" created mathematics. It is equally impossible that anything at all gave rise to mathematics. Mathematics can have no predecessor or precursor.
Mathematics is the ONLY system that is composed of necessary, eternal truths. The "Big Bang" that gave rise to the physical universe is obviously not an event that belongs to eternity. All entities of this physical universe are equally uneternal, by definition. Nothing in this physical universe is more than 13.7 billion years old.
What and where were the laws of physics before the physical universe came into being? What laws were controlling the Big Bang as it happened? What laws caused it in the first place? Whatever controlled and caused the Big Bang must, of necessity, have preceded the Big Bang.
Existence itself can be controlled only by laws that are eternal, and that means that those laws ARE in some sense existence itself. They must be indissolubly encoded in the arche - the ultimate "stuff" of existence. We cannot separate the eternal laws of existence from the eternal constituents of existence. They are somehow the same thing.
So, what fundamental, eternal things can have the eternal truths of mathematics encoded in them?
Pythagoras, the first Grand Master of the Illuminati as a formal society, was the first human being to intuit the greatest idea in human history - one that can never be surpassed - when he announced, "All things are numbers." Numbers ARE mathematics. A universe of eternal numbers comes inbuilt with the eternal laws of mathematics: the constituents of existence and the laws of existence are one and the same thing. How else can everything in the universe "know" what to do in any situation i.e. how can "particles" know what behaviour to manifest whatever we do to them unless the full laws of existence that dictate every situation are already hard-wired into them?
In the series of books based around "The God Game", we will prove that Pythagoras was absolutely correct - beyond any possible doubt.
What are numbers ontologically? They are eternal ENERGY WAVES. Once you grasp that the universe of numbers is one and the same thing as the universe of eternal, indestructible energy, Pythagoras's insight becomes a fundamentally scientific statement that no one would find controversial. (Number is the FREQUENCY of the wave: there are infinite frequencies, hence infinite numbers. Frequency IS number.)
Mainstream society ALWAYS rejects any new idea. That is a fundamental feature of human existence. Society is profoundly conservative, clinging to old, familiar things. The status quo is all-powerful because people are so terrified of change. For new ideas to succeed, there must be some kind of war or long process of conflict proceeding by some means or other. Once the new ideas become established, they themselves become the new barrier to new ideas: that's the great irony of life.
Think of the enormity of the effort involved in overthrowing Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Karmism, free-market capitalism, democracy, privilege and inheritance. The whole planet has been brainwashed with these ideas. They are part of people's core identity.
There is only ONE THING that might change all of this: the absolute, incontestable truth. Sadly, all truths, no matter how true, are always contestable. Ignorant, superstitious, faith-inclined, irrational people of feelings and desires, of selfish will, are not wired for recognising truth.
Nietzsche, the man who "called it" - who pronounced God dead - knew that the fact of God's death was neither here nor there. People would go on believing anyway. What Jew could possibly believe in an all-powerful Jewish God after the Babylonian Captivity, the Roman destruction and expulsion of the Jews from the land "promised" to them by their Jewish God, and finally the Nazi Holocaust when they were herded like cattle for the slaughter into deadly gas chambers? Yet the Jews go on believing that they are the Chosen People and that their Jewish God is still there, cherishing them - despite infinite evidence to the contrary.
In Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche went beyond God's death, and pronounced Truth dead too. He wrote, "The falseness of a judgment is to us not necessarily an objection to a judgment: it is here that our new language perhaps sounds strangest. The question is to what extent it is life-advancing, life-preserving, species-preserving, perhaps even species-breeding; and our fundamental tendency is to assert that the falsest judgments are the most indispensable to us … that to renounce false judgments would be to renounce life, would be to deny life. To recognise untruth as a condition of life: that, to be sure, means to resist customary value-sentiments in a dangerous fashion; and a philosophy which ventures to do so places itself, by that act alone, beyond good and evil."
This is one of the most extraordinary and provocative statements ever made. Yet there's something absurd about it. Even if society claims to value the truth, there is no evidence at all that it actually does. Nietzsche seeks to advance a "new" philosophy that is willing to support life enhancing lies over "truth". Yet that's what the world already has! Abrahamism is considered highly life-enhancing by those who believe in it. Studies of committed Christians show that they are often much happier and more optimistic than their secular, agnostic counterparts. Abrahamism uses the rhetoric of truth, but it has no allegiance to truth whatever.
Nietzsche seems to want to produce a philosophy that boldly dispenses with the rhetoric of truth and that "honestly" looks for the "best" lies i.e. those that most enhance life. Yet this would never work. The rhetoric of truth is in fact the greatest tool the "life-enhancing" liars have.
If Christianity proclaimed itself utterly false but immensely life enhancing, it would have no followers at all, and it wouldn't be life enhancing! It is the illusion of truth, the delusion of truth, the "game" of truth, the truth rhetoric, that is important - not truth itself. If people had any love of truth, they would all be fanatical students of mathematics, philosophy and science. Yet these are the most despised subjects in the world. Bar a small group of Logos thinkers, no one wants anything to do with these "hard" subjects. They want to live forever in their easy, facile, simplistic Mythos bubble where reality never intrudes.