A number of great dialectical struggles must be won before humanity can proceed to the next stage of its divine evolution. The most enlightened amongst us most overcome the most endarkened.

Enlightenment versus Abrahamism

Reason versus Faith

"Whenever we read the obscene stories [of the Old Testament], the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and torturous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness, with which more than half the Bible is filled, it would be more consistent that we called it the word of a demon than the Word of God. It is a history of wickedness that has served to corrupt or brutalize mankind." - Thomas Paine

Abrahamism champions faith. Faith means a strong or unshakeable belief in something without any proof. The insane person who is certain he is Napoleon is a person of faith. In fact, faith and insanity are the same thing. Why would anyone believe anything without proof? Billions of Christians believe that the Creator of the Universe was born in a stable to a Jewish virgin some 2,000 years ago. (The Jews themselves do not believe it.) Is that belief anything other than insane? It stands in absolute opposition to reason, logic, science and common sense, and even the Jews think it's stupid. Surely a claim so ridiculous must be backed up by irrefutable proof? But in fact it's backed up by no proof at all. It's just an assertion, a story in a book. Why would any sane person consider it true? And in fact no sane person would. If you believe in Christianity, you are saying that reason and science are wrong. You are rejecting everything solid, true and real in favour of a preposterous story.

Faith is quite simply an insane concept. Faith has no place in the rational world. Faith is a word that should be removed from the human vocabulary. It serves no positive function and is historically associated with extreme evil. It must be abolished.

Everything should be considered proven, provisionally proven, not proven, or refuted. At the very most charitable, the virgin birth of Jesus Christ would have to be considered not proven, and that is surely no basis for the most successful religion in world history. Science is based on evidence and reason and has wiped the floor with religion. In any contest between science and religion, science should be regarded as the default position and religion as being in severe want of evidence.

Knowledge versus Superstition

Knowledge is the antidote to superstition. Superstition, like faith, must be driven out of the vocabulary. It must be stigmatized. There is simply no place for it.

Protestants have rejected good deeds in favour of faith (via the doctrine of justification by faith). Faith is consequently selfish and immoral and encourages scorn for other people and a refusal to help and cooperate with them.

Protestantism is an evil religion. Martin Luther, its sleazy founder, declared, "Reason is the Devil's whore." A religion that hates reason and good deeds is the definition of a Satanic religion. Protestantism must be eradicated.

Most people in the world are stupid. Stupid people will never become Gods. The State should never pander to the stupid. It must do everything in its power to raise the general IQ. This can be achieved only through a) enormous investment in education, 2) enormous changes in the environment (children must be removed from ugly, unhealthy, stupid environments, 3) an assessment of whether parents are a stupid or clever influence in their children's lives (never forget that half of all parents will be below the median intelligence); if the former, contact time between parents and children must be reduced by the expedient of sending children to boarding schools where they will be supervised and taught by intelligent people.

The "Drugs War" has been going on for decades and shows no sign of being won. What's the point of this war? Is it all because some strident moralizers say that drugs are "wrong"? Well, their moralizing stance certainly hasn't accomplished any victory over drugs. Isn't it time to try non-moralizing tactics? Isn't it time to apply the scientific method, the most successful method in human history? Isn't it time to legalize drugs and collect evidence as to whether that leads to better or worse outcomes than at present? In fact, isn't it time to apply the scientific method to all aspects of the State and to eliminate moralizing entirely?

Who are the moralizers? - the priest caste and the political preachers. Who needs these people? They have troubled the world long enough. Let them be gone. Let evidence and method replace these clowns.

Resurrection is an absurd concept that makes people think their souls are created by God and are entirely under his control. In fact, souls are uncreated and eternal. When people understand that, they will realize that they are not subject to God at all. In fact, the logical conclusion of the doctrine of reincarnation is that everyone can perfect themselves and become God. Once you grasp that you are not controlled by God - that he can't send you to heaven or hell - and that you create your own fate and can send yourself to heaven because you yourself have become God then your attitude towards existence, God and yourself is transformed forever.

YOUR FATE IS IN YOUR OWN HANDS - NOT ANYONE ELSE'S. GOD, STRICTLY SPEAKING, IS IRRELEVANT TO YOU, EXCEPT AS THE SHINING BEACON THAT DRAWS YOU ONWARDS AND UPWARDS TOWARDS YOUR OWN DIVINITY.

The theory of karma is that there is some sort of moral force in the cosmos that is somehow quasi-scientific and it can "calculate" your sins versus your virtues and then create a future life for you in which your sins catch up with you and you are made to suffer, or your virtues are rewarded and you are allowed to enjoy a happy life. Of course, no one anywhere can present any plausible scientific explanation for how karma influences DNA or what environment you are going to be born in. If you are a fan of karma, try to propose how karma scientifically causes an Indian who was once a Brahmin (highest caste), but was very sinful, to come back as an Untouchable (lowest caste). How does DNA reflect the Indian caste system?

The karma doctrine is effectively saying that absolute standards of good and evil are ingrained in the fabric of the cosmos, yet this is ludicrous. How can a non-thinking entity assess good and evil? Good and evil are products of consciousness and can only be judged by consciousness. There is no good or evil in the absence of consciousness. Since karma isn't conscious, it can have no conceivable opinions of good and evil. Karma is a philosophically laughable concept. It is ridiculously naive and foolish. Like Abrahamism, karma must be consigned to the dustbin. It serves no useful function at all, and in its support for the caste system, it's inherently evil. Isn't that the supreme irony? - karma itself deserves to be punished for its wickedness. Karma, by its own logic, should reincarnate into a lower form to learn the moral lessons of its errors. And thus karma eats itself. It unravels into total absurdity.                        

Domination versus Submission

The dominants are the masters in the Hegelian dialectic, and the submissives are the slaves. The submissives are afraid to fight. They're terrified of the dominants even though they massively outnumber them.

Meritocrats versus Privileged Elites

If we want a free, meritorious world, privilege must be eradicated 100% and never again taint our world. Dynastic elites can be prevented by one extremely simple measure - 100% inheritance tax. At a stroke, the Old World Order would be destroyed.

Apart from the privileged themselves - who of course love privilege - only insane people would endorse a world of privilege. Yet huge numbers of ordinary people support the right of parents to pass on wealth to children, the essential mechanism of privilege. Just how dumb are ordinary people? They have no sense at all of their own self-interest. It's deranged to support a system that gives advantages to others and penalises you.

The family is the centre of the system of privilege. The richest families have commandeered the State to serve their interests. The State should be there to act justly and equitably towards all families, not to favour the rich. The State must dictate to the family, not the family to the State. Parents think they can do whatever they like to their children and that it's none of the State's business. In fact, everything is the State's business. Dysfunctional families create endless problems that the State has to pick up the bill for. Why is there crime, police, lawyers, courts, prisons, social workers, welfare systems etc? - because dysfunctional families can't be anything other than a source of poison in the State. Therefore the State must do everything in its power to prevent the creation of dysfunctional families that drain the resources of the State. The rights of the family are currently paramount, but it's the rights of the State that should be paramount. The State should operate on the principle that all citizens will be productive and make a positive contribution to society. If a family is not shaping up then the State has no choice but to intervene. There is no social contract that productive families should have to pay the bills of unproductive families. When a family starts making a negative contribution then, in effect, it puts itself in the care of the State and the State has the absolute right to sort out the problems of the family in whatever way it deems appropriate, regardless of the wishes of the family. By becoming a drain on the State, a family breaks the social contract and is no longer contractually protected from State intervention. There can never be any contractual principle that scroungers should be allowed to live off State benefits and offer nothing in return. The social contract between State and citizen isn't a free ride for the lazy and stupid. Citizens have obligations to the State and if they cease to fulfil those obligations, the State is entitled to expel them from the State or take remedial measures.             

The family is the basic unit of society, but if a family goes wrong - as a huge number do - it becomes a disastrous burden on the State. Given that so many families break down, it's crazy to base the raising of children on this single model that frequently fails. Family should be just one choice, and there ought to be at least one other - the commune.

What's needed is a nurturing environment. A commune is the answer, but not any old commune - a psychologically designed commune. Who are the people who give you as much support as family? - good friends. Who are your good friends? Probably people who are a very good match for your personality profile and share your likes and dislikes.

Social Capitalism versus Capitalism

Consciousness versus Bicameralism

We can only overcome primitive bicameralism by boosting consciousness (the modern, higher functioning mind that evolved from bicameralism). That means we have to give people a better education, and more exposure to reason and knowledge. These are the antidotes to bicameralism.

Right brain versus Left Brain

The connective tissue of the hemispheres - the corpus callosum - thus becomes extraordinarily important.  

Immense global corporations have acquired a power that allows them to dictate to governments. This is absurd. Corporations should never be allowed to get so big. Instead, capitalism should be based on small, bespoke companies integrated with local communities and countries.   

Everyone should be engaged in work rather than holding down a job. Work is an activity that expresses your creativity, into which you can pour your soul. Your work reflects who you are and you derive immense satisfaction from it. A job, on the other hand, is something you do to pay the bills. You hate it and get no joy from it. It makes you feel alienated and depressed. Capitalism offers plenty of jobs but very little work. We need a new social capitalism that's all about fulfilling work rather than alienating jobs.

Capitalism relentlessly targets the lowest common denominator. It's all about dumbing down and the race to the bottom. It targets primal drives and instant gratification. We need social capitalism that raises people up rather than casts them down. We need a "higher common factor" doctrine, one of quality rather than quantity.  

The universe is all about evolution. Becoming God is all about evolution.

Creationism is a catastrophic doctrine, and scientifically, morally and theologically false. Evolution is the truth of the universe and everything is becoming, evolving.

Education versus Indoctrination

Most people in the world aren't educated. Rather, they are indoctrinated with ridiculous dogmas. Look at Muslims. They are remarkably stupid because of Koranic brainwashing.

A Muslim woman said that Muslim men must have a beard because "it's in the Koran." Why doesn't such a woman ever stop to wonder why the alleged Creator of the Universe would be interested in the facial hair of men? Is bushiness of beard the measure of holiness? But, of course, Mohammed - a bearded man seeking to impose a visual brand on his followers to distinguish them from clean-shaven pagans - would be extremely keen to claim that God demanded that men have beards. Are all clean-shaven men to go to hell? What, for not having a fucking beard?!!!!!  

Reason versus Love

All the new age, hippie rhetoric about love is nauseating and reveals a deep hatred of reason and intellect. Love is a quality most often trumpeted by stupid people, incapable of any hard analysis of the world. They think that love = peace = harmony = perfect world. In fact, love = hate = division = conflict = war = violence = greed = narcissism = egotism = selfishness = privilege = everything that's wrong with the world. For "love" to have any meaning, it must be involved with a judgment that one thing (the loved thing) is better than another (the unloved thing), and the other thing then becomes "other", an object of hatred. Hitler loved Germany, so he hated Germany's perceived enemy - the Jews. The Jews love their God, so they hate everyone who does not. Privileged families love themselves and hate non-privileged families. Love AUTOMATICALLY summons hate, hence is a catastrophe. When are people going to wake up to the horrific truth of "love"?

Mythos versus Logos

The great divide in our world is between Mythos and Logos and, if we apply the commonly quoted "80/20" rule, we can assert that 80% of the world are Mythos thinkers who are attracted to simplistic, stupid religions that provide emotional comfort and facile, false "certainty". The Enlightenment was about the rise of Logos. At best, 20% of the world are Logos thinkers and they are responsible for 80% or more of the advances of the human race.

Logos must be given pride of place and Mythos exposed for what it is - the inferior partner that should be ignored when anything serious is being discussed. Mythos should be what guides us when we are at play, and Logos when we are at work.

All schools should be compelled by law to enshrine the supremacy of Logos over Mythos. Consider the Creationism versus Science debate. Creationism is pure Mythos and asserts that something is true because an old book says so, without a single fact, mathematical equation, scientific theory or any evidence at all, while science provides facts, evidence, sophisticated theories that explain all manner of phenomena, a detailed intellectual and rational framework, and an objective view completely divorced from a subjective book produced by ancient, scientifically illiterate Jews. How can there be any debate at all about which provides the right approach and the infinitely more plausible solution?

Creationists tried to have the teaching of evolution banned from schools. It ought to be the other way around. Any anti-scientific claims to truth should be prevented from being taught in schools. How else will we produce rational people unless we teach them rationally?

Serving God versus Becoming God

Everything changes if you are Becoming God rather than serving God. Then you can make up your mind about good and evil. You can get off your knees and stand on your feet. You have no respect for those false gods - monarchs, popes, preachers, prophets, the super rich, the privileged elites - who claim to be God's voice on earth.

We must never again be slaves of God. We must have a contract/covenant with God whereby we tell him what we expect of HIM. It is not for him to dictate to us. We will create Gods in our own image. They must serve our interests, not we theirs. We are all becoming God, so we need bow to no one. God is our guide, our exemplar, the light that shows us the way to join him. God is never a tyrant over us, demanding that we worship him and get on our knees and avert our eyes.

Has your life been dictated by an ancient religious book, community elders with long beards and an insular, ghetto community where everyone knows what's expected of them and everyone knows everyone else's business? Then you are tradition-directed.

Has your life been lived in your parents' shadow? Are you a clone of them? Do you share all of the same values? Then you're inner-directed, driven by the deep values your parents have instilled in you. You will stand up to traditions and peers if they contradict your inner value system. But these are not actually your own values. They have been chosen FOR you, not BY you.

Autonomy is the essence of freedom. Free people will never be slaves. They will be natural meritocrats.    

The capitalist world is one of objects. People themselves are objectified. The acquisition of objects is the highest good in our society and your status is dependent on how highly others value the objects you own. This system is spiritually dead. It creates soulless zombies in shopping malls, aimlessly shuffling from one purchase to the next in a conveyer-belt process that never ends. You can never have enough objects. You will always need the latest upgrade, the latest fashion, the highest status objects - and these are permanently changing. There is no endpoint, but when your personal end comes (your death) all you have to show for it is a lot of junk that your relatives then consign to the garbage dump. And that metaphorically and even literally is what became of your life on earth - it joined the rest of the garbage. Is that how you want to live your life?

Children versus Parents

Parents are often deemed to have absolute rights over their children, to the extent that parents are allowed to cut off the foreskin of an 8-day old baby boy without a single voice of protest being raised. The parents' belief system literally has an effect on the little boy's bodily integrity.

He is parentally "branded". He had no say in it at all. His consent was neither sought nor required. His parents were treating him as an object, a slave, a thing to which they could do anything they liked.

Eros versus Thanatos

"Pascal's wager" probably encapsulates the cult of death better than anything else. The wager is this: 1) on the one hand, if God exists and you obey his laws, you will achieve the maximum possible gain (eternal joy in heaven) while if he doesn't exist your maximum loss will be your opportunity to live as you like on earth and 2) on the other hand, if God exists and you don't obey his laws you will achieve the maximum loss (eternal pain in hell) and if he doesn't exist your maximum gain will be that you can do whatever you like with your mortal life on earth.     

Moreover, if "God" is an entirely different type of being from the one Pascal envisaged then it's possible you are sentencing yourself to eternal pain by NOT living life as fully as you can. What if God punishes those who chose to believe lies rather than live life?

The entire basis of Pascal's wager is terror. This was a man who was petrified of God, the afterlife and indeed of life itself. Who wants to sign up to a wager of fear? Is that rational? Abrahamism functions entirely on this basis. It makes you afraid to live. It drowns you in the darkness of Thanatos.  

Nietzsche wrote of the "depraving of Pascal, who believed his reason had been depraved by original sin while it had only been depraved by his Christianity!" and described him as "the most instructive of all sacrifices to Christianity."   

Negative liberty is about being free FROM. Positive liberty is about being free FOR. Negative liberty is associated with right wing distrust of the "big State". The State should exert minimal interference in people's lives. The self-interested, self-absorbed, selfish family is the essence of negative liberty.

The positive liberty doctrine considers it impossible for society to be healthy if groups are continually at each other's throats. Positive liberty States are obsessed with unity rather than the cutthroat diversity and division of negative liberty States. Positive liberty States can lead to dangerous conformity while negative liberty States generate toxic alienation and distrust between people.

Religious Truth versus the Real Truth

Hegel was of the opinion that only the philosophically minded had access to the highest truths. He regarded art and religion as ways by which non-philosophers could achieve some contact with the truth, but at a simplistic level in comparison with philosophy.

Control versus Freedom

Wolves versus Dogs

The autonomous individual is never a tame dog, nor is he a wolf praying on others.

The powerful have always abused their power and that abuse must be stopped by law.

Capitalism is all about quantity. What price? What profit? How many units sold? What cost? How many employees? And so on.

Meritocracy is about quality (what are your qualifications) while democracy is mere quantity (a head count). It's impossible for democracy to improve the quality of the human race for the simple reason that democracy makes no reference at all to quality. It simply doesn't enter into the democratic ideology. Meritocracy is purely about quality and only via meritocracy will human beings be turned first into supermen and superwomen and finally into Gods and Goddesses.

These are all the individual battles that must be fought and won to bring the Great War of Enlightenment to its end. The capitalists, the Abrahamists and the karmists are the forces of darkness. They are on the side of superstition, faith, greed, irrationality, privilege and submission to God. The Gnostics, the Agnostics, the Atheists and the Skeptics are the forces of light. They are on the side of knowledge, reason, altruism, meritocracy, art, science, mathematics, philosophy, psychology and freedom.

Humanity, if it is to take a divine leap forward, must prove that it has learned from the past. It can do so only by erasing most of the past. It's a monumental and breathtaking disgrace that the deranged beliefs of ancient Jews still infect billions of people in the 21st century. How can any sane person in this day and age believe that the Creator of the Universe ordered a father to make a human sacrifice of his own son in order to test his obedience? Note that no one ever considers the psychological damage to Abraham's son who knew for a fact that his own father was prepared to murder him in the name of God. There was no moral dimension at all to God's deadly order, only an immoral one. It was an order of pure, Satanic evil and anyone who tries to defend it simply shows himself to be as evil as his master. The sole purpose of God's order was to establish an absolute and permanent relationship of master and slave between humanity and himself. All human beings must obey him without question, even if it means killing their children. You would need to be mentally fucked beyond repair to have anything but revulsion towards Abraham's "God". He is not God, he is the Devil. We can eradicate the Devil's power over us by eradicating Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The Nazis spoke of the Final Solution and there does indeed need to be a final reckoning of the Abrahamic question. Humanity is finished unless it slays Abrahamism once and for all. The long overdue death of Abrahamism is the sine qua non for human freedom. It ought to have died out when it was categorically refuted by science, but, being irrational, it's immune to facts, evidence, logic and reason. That's exactly why it's so evil and dangerous. You can't negotiate with Abrahamists. You can't rationally disprove their beliefs not because of any problem with your disproof but because they fundamentally reject rational discourse and they won't listen to you i.e. they have abolished the tool that proves that they are wrong. They are beyond help.

Only those individuals who are prepared to eat of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil are conscious human beings. All of the rest are the damned. The greatest metaphorical act in human history was when the first woman ate the Eden apple. That act, far from being the original sin, was the first act of human consciousness, the first proof that humans themselves could be Gods. It was also a declaration of war on "God" - the false God, the Demiurge, the Jewish God, the God of divine master and human slave. How much better this world would have been if not one Jew had ever appeared in this world, if Abraham had rejected the manifest Satan that ordered him to kill his son. The essence of Judaism and Abrahamism is that if a voice in your head tells you to kill your own flesh and blood you will do so without question. All of the psychopathic behaviour of Abrahamists down the ages stems from the JEWISH principle that humans must obey God no matter what. That is the sole Jewish "contribution" to the world - the doctrine that we must be God's slaves. The Muslims have embraced the doctrine even more thoroughly and even call their religion SUBMISSION. Be in no doubt, the only true religion is Illumination, the religion of FREEDOM.   

EVERYTHING stems from this conflict between slavery and freedom. The slave religions place faith and obedience above all else. Illumination, the religion of freedom, places reason, knowledge and logic above all else - because these are the instruments of freedom. The Enlightenment was all about how to increase reason and freedom at the expense of faith and slavery. But victory has not been achieved. An uneasy standoff now prevails, but the slave religions are continuing to grow at an alarming pace in the Third World amongst the legions of the illiterate and superstitious. The Great War of Enlightenment must now be decisively and definitely won. The Jewish crime against the world must be erased. Had their doctrine of slavery to God never been born, humanity could now be living in Paradise. Their doctrine of slavery to God soon enough gave rise to slavery to Man, in the shape of privileged elites who proclaimed that their right to rule was God-given. To resist being their slaves amounted to defiance of God himself, a crime worthy of eternal hellfire. This terrifying ideology has shaped our world ever since. The interests of Abrahamism and the Old World Order coincide perfectly. They are both all about human slavery.             

The Armageddon Conspiracy by Mike Hockney was all about the Illuminati's ancient plot to kill this monster-God.                           

How dare any Abrahamist or capitalist stand in our way? How dare they defend their Satanic Lord? The barbarians must be destroyed. The damned must reap their just desserts. The Devil-God of Abrahamism must be eliminated. The Old World Order must fall.

You are all called as soldiers to this war. This is the war of the Second Enlightenment. The purpose of the First Enlightenment was to end privilege (monarchy) and faith (Christianity). There was a modicum of success, but the privileged and faithful are still with us. Many who claim to be enlightened are not enlightened at all. How can any enlightened person be a Christian, Jew or Muslim? The agenda of these ancient, decrepit systems of superstition were the central target of the Enlightenment. These religions remain as benighted as ever. They have no connection with reason, knowledge and plausibility. We always feel embarrassed on behalf of academics when they proclaim themselves "believers". And we always think they should be fired. How can people of faith be allowed to remain in institutions of reason? It's absurd. Luther was exactly right when he said that reason was faith's deadliest enemy. So how can any person claiming to be rational also declare himself a believer? They might as well believe in elves at the bottom of the garden.       

DELENDA EST CARTHAGO!

 

The Lawgivers

Solon (638 BCE - 558 BCE) was an Athenian statesman credited with laying the foundations for democracy - the first appearance of democracy in world history. Cleisthenes (570 - 507 BCE) later carried forward Solon's work and earned the title of "the father of Athenian democracy" by introducing democracy proper.

*****

The Spartans were different from the Athenians not because Spartans and Athenians were different types of human being but because the laws under which they were governed produced citizens with profoundly different strengths, aptitudes, qualities and character. LAWS CREATE PEOPLE. Good laws produce good citizens. Stupid laws create stupid people. Getting its laws right is a State's most important task, yet most States are preoccupied with how to establish the set of laws most favourable to the privileged elite.

In exactly the same way, modern lawgivers can lay down laws that will give rise to perfect human beings, to supermen and superwomen. All we need to do is rationally construct laws, using all of the lessons we have learned from human history, to achieve the goal we desire - the birth of the HyperHuman: the strong-willed, self-creating, self-defining, independent, autonomous individual who bends the knee to no one, who has the highest possible self-confidence and self-esteem and knows he will become everything he has it within him to be.

Plutarch provides an account of the reforms carried out by Lycurgus to make it the famous city-state it became. Some of the highlights are shown below, including 1) the redistribution of land, 2) making money so heavy and cumbersome that it was hard to use and entirely obvious how much of it people had (and easy to detect any corrupt transactions) 3) communal eating and 4) to create a happy, united and virtuous people:

9 Next, he undertook to divide up their movable property also, in order that every vestige of unevenness and inequality might be removed; and when he saw that they could not bear to have it taken from them directly, he took another course, and overcame their avarice by political devices. In the first place, he withdrew all gold and silver money from currency, and ordained the use of iron money only. Then to a great weight and mass of this he gave a trifling value, so that ten minas' worth required a large storeroom in the house, and a yoke of cattle to transport it. When this money obtained currency, many sorts of iniquity went into exile from Lacedaemon. For who would steal, or receive as a bribe, or rob, or plunder that which could neither be concealed, nor possessed with satisfaction, nay, nor even cut to pieces with any profit? For vinegar was used, as we are told, to quench the red-hot iron, robbing it of its temper and making it worthless for any other purpose, when once it had become brittle and hard to work.

10 With a view to attack luxury still more and remove the thirst for wealth, he introduced his third and most exquisite political device, namely, the institution of common messes, so that they might eat with one another in companies, of common and specified foods, and not take their meals at home, reclining on costly couches at costly tables, delivering themselves into the hands of servants and cooks to be fattened in the dark, like voracious animals, and ruining not only their characters but also their bodies, by surrendering them to every desire and all sorts of surfeit, which call for long sleeps, hot baths, abundant rest, and, as it were, daily nursing and tending. This was surely a great achievement, but it was a still greater one to make wealth "an object of no desire," as Theophrastus says, and even 'unwealth,' by this community of meals and simplicity of diet.

31 It was not, however, the chief design of Lycurgus then to leave his city in command over a great many others, but he thought that the happiness of an entire city, like that of a single individual, depended on the prevalence of virtue and concord within its own borders. The aim, therefore, of all his arrangements and adjustments was to make his people free-minded, self-sufficing, and moderate in all their ways, and to keep them so as long as possible. His design for a civil polity was adopted by Plato, Diogenes, Zeno, and by all those who have won approval for their treatises on the subject, although they left behind them only writings and words. Lycurgus, on the other hand, produced not only writings and words, but an actual polity which was beyond imitation, and because he gave, to those who maintain that the much talked of natural disposition to wisdom exists only in theory, an example of an entire city given to the love of wisdom, his family rightly transcended that of all who ever founded polities among the Greeks. Therefore Aristotle says that the honours paid him in Sparta were less than he deserved, although he enjoys the highest honours there. For he has a temple, and sacrifices are offered to him yearly as to a god. It is also said that when his remains were brought home, his tomb was struck by lightning, and that this hardly happened to any other eminent man after him except Euripides, who died and was buried at Arethusa in Macedonia. The lovers of Euripides therefore regard it as a great testimony in his favour that he alone experienced after death what had earlier befallen a man who was most holy and beloved of the gods.

*****

We must turn to lawgivers who will provide us with a constitution that enshrines reason as the highest good and the central axis of the State. Anything that subverts reason should be outlawed. In particular, that means that no religions of faith should be permitted in a rational State.

The Three Missing Books

Three articles that should have appeared in August, had our plans not been sabotaged, have now been released as ebooks, available from the Amazon Kindle Store:  

This is a formal theological disproof of the central tenets of Christianity - the Trinity and the Incarnation. The reason why most Christians continue to believe is that a) they have been brainwashed by their parents, schools, communities and governments and b) they don't know anything about Christian theology.

The absurdities of Christianity can be understood only by examining the many heresies that sprang up in the early centuries of the Church, challenging every aspect of orthodox Christian thinking. These heresies have boxed in Christianity so much that all that's left is a statement of what Christianity ISN'T rather than what it is. Any Christian theologian who attempts to meaningfully explain the Trinity and Incarnation instantly succumbs to one heresy or another. It's only possible to be a Trinitarian Christian by stating the formula "three persons in one God" over and over again, without daring to specify what, exactly, "person" means. The mantra is devoid of meaning and any attempt to assign meaning slips into heresy. Similarly, Christians mouth the hollow formula of the Incarnation: "two natures, human and divine, in one person" without having any idea of what "nature" means. Is nature consciousness, personality, will, intelligence? Does Christ have a human soul, a divine soul or both? Is he a God-man mutant, a hybrid? In what way can he be said to have any genuine connection with humanity at all? How does the Incarnation fit with the Trinity?

Is the human nature of Jesus Christ now part of the Trinity? If not, where did it go? Was Jesus Christ simply a super-angel? If he was "begotten" of God then he can't BE God since there must have been a time before he was begat when he didn't exist. A non-existent God is an impossibility therefore the Son of God can't be God. This is the basis of the famous Arian heresy, which came perilously close to becoming Christian orthodoxy.

Who is Jesus Christ's father? Shouldn't it be God the Son since God the Son and Jesus Christ (the Son of God) are supposedly one and the same being? Yet the "infallible" scriptures clearly identify the Holy Spirit, not God the Son, as Jesus' father. He has the WRONG father. Christianity should, logically, be all about the HOLY SPIRIT since he provides Jesus' divine element. Christianity couldn't even rationally work out who Jesus' father must be for it to make sense.

Theologically, Christianity is comical. The myriad errors are simply ignored. No Christian cares about the truth content of what they believe. Christians have no relationship whatever with the truth.

Ponder the science of divine conception. How does the process work scientifically? Could you write 1,000 words on the subject? If you can't, of what value is your Christian faith?

Other topics included in this book are 1) the three-stage degeneration of the rich 2) do truth genes exist? 3) the mysteries of Jewish toilet paper 4) do Muslims believe in a flat earth and semi-circular planetary orbits (and planets that are "hiding", waiting to be activated by the Will of Allah, when they are out of sight?) 5) do Muslims believe in seven flat earths in a stack beneath seven heavens? 6) is the Church of England on the verge of extinction? 7) the trials, tribulations and treachery of "The Movement".

This is a book by the Pythagorean Illuminati. We are the sworn enemies of Abrahamism, privileged elites and the infantile legions of conspiracy theorists. Do not read our books if you are a stupid, cheap and petty person. Only seekers of true enlightenment will profit from studying our work.   

Seven hundred years ago, it was rational to be religious. Religion was the apex of a coherent worldview linking all of the knowledge of the world then available, including the science and cosmology of the time. Religion nowadays seems ridiculous because the modern paradigm of scientific materialism has destroyed the link between humanity and the divine order. To be religious in the past wasn't stupid; now it is. The religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam have been comprehensively refuted.

This book explores the ancient Greek and medieval cosmology that supported the view that Earth was specially created by God. The "crystal spheres" of the heavens, with Earth at the centre, were beautiful, wondrous and inspiring. They fitted in perfectly with ideas of spirituality, angels and astrology.

Dante's "Divine Comedy" of the early 14th century cannot be bettered in terms of its portrayal of the Created Order. No one in Dante's time seriously doubted that the universe was designed this way. The state-of-the-art artistic vision which he presented incorporated all available religious, scientific and cosmological knowledge.

Only with Copernicus and then Thomas Digges did the religious worldview collapse. Yet humanity goes on believing in religions that are now demonstrably false. Even though humanity has never known more than it does now and most people have a basic education, legions of people still believe in formally refuted ideas. In Dante's time, it would have been mad for the ordinary person not to believe in a Creator. Now it would be mad to believe in one.

This book is an exploration of why mainstream religion made perfect sense seven hundred years ago but not now. You can't go on believing ideas that have been categorically disproved. The book examines Dante's "Divine Comedy", John Milton's "Paradise Lost", Islamic cosmology, ancient Greek cosmology, Kabbalah and myths about Heaven and Hell.

This is one of a series of books by the Pythagorean Illuminati, designed to reveal the absurdity and untenability of the Abrahamic religions in the modern scientific era.

Note that these books are anti-Old World Order samizdat and agitprop publications that have been nowhere near the gatekeeper publishing houses of the OWO. Completely uncensored, they are the vehicles of the purest free speech available in the world today. If they have a certain rough and ready anti-corporate quality, it's because huge teams of expensive, glossy capitalist "packagers" have had no involvement with the production of these books. If you want a coffee table book, go somewhere else. If you want the truth, WELCOME!

Join the Revolution!

"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

"The God Factory" by Mike Hockney is the first of three books setting out the basis of Illumination, the religion of the Ancient Order of the Illuminati. The other two forthcoming titles are - "The God Game: How to Create the Universe" and "The Illuminated Soul".

Illumination formally began with the ancient Greek mystic and mathematician Pythagoras and is the world's only "Logos" religion i.e. a rational religion founded on mathematics, science and philosophy. It has no connection with "Mythos" religions such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam which are based on faith, superstition, irrationality, stories, parables, myths, legends and "divine revelations". These religions are false in every possible way.

Illumination is the only true religion. It's the Grand Unified Theory of Everything, linking science, religion, psychology, philosophy and even the paranormal. It does so via the sole medium of truth and absolute knowledge: mathematics, which Pythagoras enigmatically declared to be the arche, the fundamental substance of existence. Ontology and epistemology are finally united in the doctrine of "living mathematics". Mathematics is not a reflection or model of reality. Mathematics IS reality.

This book provides the ultimate answers to the nature of existence. Whereas science is based on "mathematical materialism", Illumination uses Leibnizian "mathematical idealism". These are the only two possible accounts of reality. All other systems are bogus, worthless and pernicious.

In order to follow the one, true religion, you must have an IQ well above average. No Jew, Christian or Muslim could ever hope to comprehend Illumination. Quite simply, the truth is not for everyone. The truth is a function of reason, not faith and superstition. All atheists, agnostics, skeptics and cynics will find a spiritual home within Illumination. They are most welcome. "Believers" are not.

This is not a book for the faint-hearted. It is intellectually daunting and makes enormous demands of the reader. It addresses the core questions of existence and provides the only possible solutions. Illumination is the final answer to the ultimate questions. This is the book the world has always been waiting for.

Apart from setting out the principles of Illumination, it critically examines Theosophy, Madame Blavatsky, Anthroposophy, Rudolf Steiner, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, the Noosphere, the Omega Point, Spinoza, Schopenhauer, Kant, Neoplatonism, Henri Bergson, and Elan Vital.

It discusses the ideas of such great Illuminists as Pythagoras, Leibniz, Hegel, Nicholas of Cusa, Giordano Bruno, Jakob Boehme and Paracelsus.

The Pythagorean Illuminati are the sworn enemies of Abrahamism (the deranged belief system that God would order fathers to kill their children), privileged elites and the infantile legions of conspiracy theorists. Do not read our books if you are a stupid, cheap and petty person, or if you would be prepared to murder your child if "God" ordered it. Only seekers of true enlightenment will profit from reading our work.

The three non-fiction books we have mentioned will form the technical background for the coded work of fiction called "The Soul Camera" by Mike Hockney, due at the end of 2013.

Imagine a camera that takes pictures of the human soul. Imagine it could detect how good or evil you are. Imagine it could analyze every aspect of your personality. Imagine it could tell you how many times you have been reincarnated. Imagine it could tell you how close you are to achieving gnosis and becoming GOD!

Imagine that a real secret society already possesses such a camera, which operates in accordance with the inviolable, fundamental principles of the cosmos - six-dimensional mathematical idealism (as opposed to the bogus 11-dimensional mathematical materialism of contemporary science based on "M-theory").

The Paradigm Shift is coming. Humanity is about to enter its divine phase.

The Soul Camera by the Illuminati. Due at the end of 2013.

Mike Hockney, Michael Faust and Adam Weishaupt.

*****

Our three most important books are the God Factory, The God Game: How to Create the Universe and The Illuminated Soul. These are the books which present Illumination in its proper Logos form. None of the content is available on this website. These books and one other book concerning the mysteries of the right hemisphere of the brain conclude the teaching material for all Illuminati degrees up to and including the Sixth Degree of the Illuminati.

  

One way to bring about an immediate change in the tone of the world and the way it operates is for those who have hitherto ruled the world - men - to be replaced in the top positions of power by those who been oppressed by men - women. Human history would have been entirely different under women. Isn't the rational thing to do to give women the opportunity to run the world? One thing's for sure - they can't fuck it up worse than the men.

In 2006, Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry stated that he believes in the inerrancy of the Bible and that those who don't accept Jesus as their saviour will go to hell. Biblical "inerrancy" is the doctrinal position that the Bible is totally free of error, that "Scripture in the original manuscripts does not affirm anything that is contrary to fact," that Scripture is infallible.

Freedumb and Dumbocracy

Dumbocracy is a system for producing a false consciousness in the people. They are relentlessly lied to that democracy is in their interests when it manifestly isn't. When you are incapable of recognising that you are being deceived, when you proudly repeat the lies of the liars, that's what it means to have a false consciousness.

GOD

FAMILY