The Dark Master of Ego
Christians, Jews and Muslims claim that an infinitely powerful and perfect God created the world, which immediately raises the question of why his creation is so wrong. Gnostics give a much simpler answer. The world is bad, wicked and wrong because its creator is bad, wicked and wrong. "As above, so below." Good creator; good world. Bad creator; bad world. The logic is irresistible for those of a religious mindset. (Evolutionists attribute it to random genetic mutation and subsequent natural selection.)
But it is completely wrong to characterise the world as a battlefield of good and evil. Satan is not a creature with horns and a pitchfork. Evil is not his essence. Instead, selfishness, arrogance and narcissism define him. Satan is the creature of the Ego. He is the ego taken to its logical conclusion, ego maximised and deified, to the degree at which it is utterly blind to others, and spectacularly self-deluded: psychopathic egotism.
Satan is the master of the psychology of the ego. He knows everything about it, and how to manipulate it in others. The war he wages is psychological, and that is the most effective and deadly war of all because it directly targets the human soul. The world is a giant mind lab where human egos are tempted, tantalised, teased, and tormented. Satan cultivates, nourishes and rewards some souls; others he seeks to destroy.
Yet the number of active players in Satan's "game" is tiny - just a few thousand out of all the billions of people on earth. Why so few? Because Satan couldn't care less about the souls of little old ladies and the legions of the Ignavi who run around hither and thither to no effect. He only hunts big game. You yourself are almost certainly not in the game at the moment, but that can all change. If you begin to understand the nature of what's really going on, Satan's attention may turn to you. Then you might experience the ultimate test. If Satan offers you the stuff of your dreams - making all of your secret wishes come true - what then?
Know Thyself
To understand the war against Satan, you must first of all know yourself. Are you submissive or dominant? Satan has no interest in submissives. Their nature is to play follow the leader. Satan's game involves only the leaders, the dominant ones. Are you extravert or introvert? Extraverts, according to the great psychologist Carl Jung, are those who look to the outer world, while introverts are drawn to the inner world. Jung says of extraverts: "[They have] an outgoing, candid and accommodating nature that adapts easily to a given situation, quickly forms attachments, and, setting aside any possible misgivings, will often venture forth with careless confidence into unknown situations." As for introverts (of which Jung himself was one): "[They have] a hesitant, reflective, retiring nature that keeps itself to itself, is always slightly on the defensive and prefers to hide behind mistrustful scrutiny."
Does the latter sound like you? Nearly all of the Illuminati are introverts. Hans Eysenck characterised the difference between the extraverts and introverts using a different approach that he referred to as cortical arousal. "Introverts," he said, "are characterized by higher levels of activity than extraverts and so are chronically more cortically aroused than extraverts". Consequently, an introvert seeks lower levels of stimulation because he is already "buzzing" internally. The extravert on the other hand craves stimulation because he has so little going on inside; he's bored to tears with his own company. He wants lots of activity, a hectic social life, all sorts of external arousal, to compensate for the vacuum inside him. (And consider another possibility; the higher self is much more active in the introvert, and this is contributing to the increase in cortical arousal. The level of arousal may actually be a means of measuring the degree to which the higher self is attempting to make contact with the ordinary self.)
The difference between extraverts and introverts can also be characterised in a religious way. Extraverts are attuned to the things of the world. They are materialistic and hungry for status, possessions and power. They hate looking inwards because they invariably find almost nothing there. The introverts are the opposite. They are anti-materialistic and have little interest in the cheap, gaudy "glories" of this world. They always look inwards where they find a rich and dazzling inner world that seems to offer them the prospect of reaching an understanding of the universe. Only introverts stand much of a chance of ever encountering their higher self. Most extraverts aren't looking and aren't interested. In fact many believe they have already attained their higher selves when they have a good night out, full of sex, drugs, drink and laughter.
Introverts are unworldly while extraverts are obsessed with the things of the world. The introverts are the natural children of the True God, while the extraverts are those who tend to gravitate towards Satan - Rex Mundi, the King of the World, master of materialism.
So, are you submissive or dominant, extravert or introvert? Satan is primarily interested in dominant extraverts while he fears dominant introverts. Most of those reading this website will be dominant introverts. The Illuminati is an organisation predominantly of dominant introverts.
The mind war that is waged on earth - and over which Satan and his archons preside - is between dominant extraverts and dominant introverts. Submissives play no part. Since the dominant extraverts are much more aligned to the world, they are usually far more successful in terms of money and power than the dominant introverts who are often not worldly at all. Dominant extraverts seek domination over others; dominant introverts are like Nietzsche's Supermen who seek dominance primarily over themselves: they want to be experts in self-mastery.
Every problem on earth could be solved and Satan's power smashed forever if only the world were controlled by dominant, altruistic introverts rather than dominant, selfish extraverts. That, in truth, is the historical mission of the Illuminati - to end the tyrannical rule of those who seek dominance over others rather than dominance over themselves.
From the ranks of dominant introverts come all of the world's greatest philosophers, poets, mystics, artists, seers, theoretical scientists, theoretical psychologists, theoretical mathematicians, prophets, authors of novels of ideas, makers of spiritual films, visionaries, shamans, gurus, wandering holy men. They are perfectionists, system builders and architects of grand utopias. They are often highly unconventional but they try to mask it for sake of social conformity. They are the inspiration of the world - its soul - but they are certainly not the world's rulers. That is the world's tragedy. (But the Illuminati are aware of another great danger - dominant introverts who have activated their "shadow" and become as bad as the dominant extraverts. One of Satan's central aims is to cause the unleashing of the shadow of dominant introverts. This has led to many of his greatest triumphs.)
Who are the greediest people on earth? Dominant extraverts. Who are the people consumed with lust for power? Dominant extraverts. Who are those obsessed with status and worldly successful? Dominant extraverts. In Hegel's master-slave dialectic, who are the masters? Dominant extraverts. Which people make up the bulk of the political class of Washington DC? Dominant extraverts. Which people make up the bulk of Wall Street's captains? Dominant extraverts. Most lawyers, entrepreneurs, tycoons and moguls are what? Dominant extraverts.
Given the incredible wealth and power of dominant extraverts, what possible chance do the Illuminati have in ever overthrowing these natural-born tyrants, these firstborn children of Satan? The Illuminati have a single advantage - they are much smarter. Unfortunately, their smartness comes in the form of an unworldly, abstract intelligence that does not readily lend itself to taking power from those who already have it and know exactly how to use it.
Dominant introverts have the answers to the world's problems, but they can't get into a position of power where they can implement those answers. The world is set up to ensure that those who are smart enough to run it benevolently and in the interests of all will never get into power. This is the supreme Satanic irony. The world is left with the worst people in charge - egotists and narcissists always looking out for number one. That is why Satan is so hard to defeat.
Every mainstream system on earth - religious, political, economic, educational, social, military, legal - is set up by and for dominant extraverts. They are Satan's most beloved, his levers for controlling this wretched earth.
When you contemplate Satan, don't think of the fires of hell and the acrid whiff of brimstone. Instead, think of Satan and his archons as resembling smartly dressed Wall Street executives. Think of them in a luxury headquarters full of state-of-the-art technology. Imagine that they possess the psychological profiles of everyone significant. Just as recruitment head-hunters have the task of finding the "best" person for a job, so Satan and his archons seek the best people to advance their agenda. If they ever approached you, you would have no idea who they were - although you might well have a strong intuition. They would seem highly intelligent, capable, polished, articulate, calm and controlled, cool and confident. You might never have met people so sure of themselves. They might dazzle you. And when they said good things about you, then made you an incredible offer allowing all of your dreams to come true, would you ask too many questions? You might be tempted to enter a Faustian pact with them, but it wouldn't be one where they demanded your soul or asked you to sign any contract in blood. None of that is necessary. When you deal with them, your soul is already lost. They are simply leading it in the direction in which it is eager to go.
They don't say who they are. They don't offer any details about themselves. They simply say that they represent the most ancient and powerful organisation on earth that very rarely gives anyone an opportunity to work with it. They say that they only deal with elite people, the very finest in the world.
Do you turn them down? Virtually no one turns their back on this particular organisation. They could easily call themselves Dream Corp, because they deliver beyond people's wildest dreams.
Jung's Psychological Types
It was Jung who defined the two basic "attitudes": extravert and introvert. If you strongly exhibit one attitude in your conscious life then, he said, the other attitude becomes unconscious and acts in a compensatory manner i.e. if you are extravert normally, your unconscious will compensate by being introverted and in times of stress this unconscious attitude will erupt and take command of your consciousness until the stress is relieved and you return to normal. Extraverts and introverts tend to misunderstand each other. They have little liking and respect for reach other.
Jung then defined a four-part psychic structure called the "quaternity". The ancient Greeks defined four different human temperaments ("humours"): choleric, melancholic, sanguine and phlegmatic, which arose from four qualities (hot, cold, dry and moist), and four basic elements (fire, earth, air and water). Nature has four seasons, the compass has four points, Buddhism has four noble truths, there are four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, four letters of the Tetragrammaton, four gospels. Four, to Jung, was an almost mystical number.
Jung's quaternity consisted of two opposite pairs: thinking and feeling, intuition and sensing. A thinking person is someone who likes to make judgements using the power of reason in preference to emotion and snap value judgements; a feeling person is guided by value-judgements and emotions rather than reason. An intuitive person is future-orientated and imaginative, their mind instantly trying to conclude what a present event means for the future; a sensing person lives in the moment with no regard to the future - his five senses are fully engaged, sucking in every detail. He lives in the "now" rather than a hypothetical future.
If you are a strong thinker, your feeling side will be pushed into your unconscious, and vice versa. If you are strongly intuitive, your sensing side will be pushed into your unconsciousness and vice versa. In times of crisis, these unconscious functions can erupt in uncontrolled and disturbing ways.
Jung argues that each of us is dominated by one of these four functions. Some of us are ruled by the thinking function, some by intuition, some by sensing and some by feeling. The opposite function (with the opposite attitude) then becomes unconscious. The other two become auxiliary functions, one of which will support the primary function (with the opposite attitude) and one of which will become unconscious (with the same attitude) to compensate.
The unconscious functions can play a huge role in our lives. The thinking person may react ferociously and with excessive emotion when others act irrationally. The feeling person, in a crisis, may try to adopt a thinking approach to get him out of it, but is likely to get it all wrong and reach terrible decisions that make his situation worse. The sensing type may suddenly be overwhelmed by intuitions that are chaotic and crazy and lead him to join cults and the like. The intuitive person, in stressful situations, may be overwhelmed by sensations and engage in entirely inappropriate sensation-seeking activities.
Repressed feelings manifest themselves in hysteria. Repressed sensing manifests itself in phobias, compulsions and obsessions. Repressed thinking manifests itself in dogmatic certainty. Repressed intuition manifests itself in wild speculation.
Good mental health involves trying to cultivate the repressed, unconscious function and make it conscious, and also bringing the remaining functions more into consciousness. A fully rounded person is someone who has a good, conscious balance of all four functions.
Jung's scheme leads to eight psychological types, in four pairs:
1) Introvert Thinking 2) Extravert Thinking
3) Introvert Feeling 4) Extravert Feeling
5) Introvert Intuition 6) Extravert Intuition
7) Introvert Sensing 8) Extravert Sensing
1) Philosophers and theoretical scientists are typical introverted thinkers. They construct grand, rational schemes that explain the whole of reality. They are not highly engaged with the normal world or normal people. They are obsessed with their own ideas and are always seeking the Holy Grail that furnishes all of the answers. Many members of the Illuminati are of this type.
2) Practical scientists, economists, lawyers and management consultants are typical of extroverted thinkers. They look for facts and evidence in the real world. They avoid speculation. They are much more interested in small, well-verified projects than the all-compassing grand schemes of the introverted thinkers.
3) Poets, artists, musicians, monks and nuns are typical of introverted feeling types. They can seem mysterious, enigmatic and appear as they though they are enjoying the most exquisite, overwhelming and profoundest feelings of which humans are capable. Their loves, their passions, their emotions, will always seem vastly more intense than those of others.
4) Hollywood actors, chat show hosts, public relations experts, media "personalities" are typical of extraverted feeling types. They love making shows of their feelings and can often seem fickle and obsessed with fashion as they switch their passions from one thing to another. Their love lives can be chaotic as they can rapidly fall in and out of love. They crave social success and being in the limelight. Hollywood stars giving their tear-filled, melodramatic acceptance speeches at the Oscars ceremony sum up this type.
5) Introverted intuition types can be mystics, future-oriented poets, painters and writers, religious thinkers, authentic clairvoyants, authentic psychics, seers and visionaries. They often see themselves as unrecognised geniuses, unfairly overlooked by society, but with great and unique knowledge of esoteric, religious, scientific and philosophical matters at the most speculative end of the spectrum. Many members of the Illuminati are of this type. They can strike more "grounded" people as daydreamers, cranks, charlatans, people with unrealistic expectations, and people who go off on flights of fantasy.
6) Extraverted intuition types are those who are quick to see and seize an opportunity. Entrepreneurs are of this type, and con men, scammers, carpetbaggers, and speculators. Many "conceptual" artists belong to this type. Public relations spokespeople, advertising bosses, illusionists, "magic" performers, fake psychics, adventurers and explorers are other examples of this type. They tend to manipulate people on the basis of future promises and dreams. The Old World Order contains many people of this type. Wall Street is full of them.
7) Introverted sensing types are those who are almost overwhelmed by sensory information. They suck in and savour every detail. Connoisseurs, aesthetes, wine tasters, art critics, food critics, music critics and fashion critics are of this type.
8) Extroverted sensation types are those who seek pleasure through their five senses. They aren't interested in the world of intuition and are firmly wedded to the physical world. They are practical and hard-headed, dealing strictly with the facts. They love eating, drinking, sex, speed, drugs, sports, dangerous sports, excitement, music, fashion. Their craving for novel sensations can lead them into addiction, compulsion and perversion. Racing drivers, sportsmen, film producers , many celebrities, music stars and leading actors are of this type. This type are particularly easily seduced by Satan and his archons. They are often extremely greedy because money gives them the ability to indulge their desire for sensual pleasures and the expensive habits they tend to acquire. These people love luxury. You will find the richest of them in the finest restaurants, enjoying the highest cuisine and most expensive wines. They will buy fast cars, yachts, and live in grand mansions. They love wearing bling and the most fashionable clothes. They are obsessed with signs of status, and are highly attuned to the most subtle differences and distinctions between people. They drip with gold and diamonds and can be extremely snobby. They like to travel to exotic destinations. The Old World Order contains many of this type. These are the people mired in materialism and sensation-seeking. Those of this type who are not rich are obsessed with computer and video games (as loud, realistic and violent as possible), action movies, driving fast cars, sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll, music festivals, beer festivals. They always walk around with headphones on, constantly listening to music. They can't bear being quiet and thinking private thoughts. These are the type most naturally inclined towards Satan. There is nothing spiritual and thoughtful about them. They are a huge obstacle to a better world because they drag everything back to materialism and sensationalism. They always need louder and bigger bangs for their buck. On Facebook, they endlessly stare at pictures. Lowbrow, noisy, speed-filled Hollywood action movies are targeted at them. They don't like reading or anything that takes them away from instant gratification.
In order to compensate for their weaknesses, it's not unusual for different types to seek relationships with those who have the opposite traits; introverts might seek out extraverts and vice versa, thinking types might seek feeling types and vice versa, sensing types might seek intuitive types and vice versa. They may think that they can become "whole" by being with someone who has the opposite qualities, but often they come into conflict, fail to understand each other and make each other unhappy. Equally, those who have relationships with those with identical psychological traits can magnify their problems. Two introverted thinkers coming together might become highly reclusive and withdraw form the world, preferring to remain in their world of inner thought.
The Alien Races of Humanity
A famous pop psychology book called Men Are From Mars and Women Are From Venus suggests that men and women have such little understanding of each other that they might as well be from different planets. But that suggestion is equally true of extraverts and introverts, thinkers and feeling types, intuitives and sensing types. They all struggle to understand each other because they are all relating to the world in entirely different ways. They don't tune into what the others are tuning into. They're not on the same wavelength. They miss the subtleties that the others see, and vice versa. Quite simply, they don't communicate properly. They misunderstand each other, dislike each other, don't relate, don't empathise. They seem alien. They often get into conflicts with the others and become enemies. They frustrate and exasperate each other. How can other people possibly be like this, each category thinks of the other. But it's not that one is right and the other wrong, one good and one evil. Rather, they're just seeing the world differently. If we want a better world with more harmony and less conflict there's a simple way to achieve it: keep similar personality types together and keep them away from dissimilar personality types.
It's as though the world has several alien races living on it. They're not alien via race, religion, family or sex, but via different psychological make-ups. Everything in the world can in fact be understood and explained through Jungian psychological typing. Below, we will show how history, religion, politics, nations, cultures, books, films, TV, education - everything under the sun - is a product of psychology. Psychology, not to put too fine a point on it, is the key to unlocking the potential of humanity. The first nation that turns to psychological principles to shape its future will be the one that sets the destiny of the human race and provides our escape route from the control of the Demiurge and his archons.
The alien races all have very different tastes. Sensing types love action and war movies, intuitives love sci-fi and fantasy, feeling types love rom-coms and dramas, and thinking types love intelligent thrillers and mysteries. Sensing types prefer comic books, thinking types non-fiction, feeling types literary fiction and intuitive types sci-fi. Computer and video games are mostly for sensing types. Awards for films and books are absurd because there's no such thing as a universally good book or film. Every alien race has its own taste. Feeling types might love The Great Gatsby, the other types might find it unreadable nonsense. Hollywood caters much more for sensing and feeling types than it does for thinkers and intuitives.
The people who run the film and book industries tend to come from certain personality types and not from others. There are few thinkers in Hollywood or the world of fiction. There are few feeling types in science and engineering.
Politicians tend to be extraverted sensing and feeling types. Is that sensible? The world would be a far better place if they were thinking and intuitive types. Most of our world is run by the wrong types of people.
The culture of the western world is very much based on sensing and feeling rather than intuition and thinking. The Old World Order love manipulating submissive sensing and feeling extraverts. They hate dominant intuitive and thinking introverts who form the core of the resistance to the Old World Order.
Every corporation has a culture based on Jungian personality types. Usually the chief executive officer sets the tone. If you have an opposite personality type, you shouldn't work there since you will come into conflict with the prevailing culture, you won't be happy, you won't prosper and you will never be appreciated or promoted. Careers advice should revolve around each person's Jungian psychological type. Every person could be sensibly steered towards jobs in which they will flourish because they are the right "fit", and steered away from careers and companies that will never suit their psychological type.
History reflects conflicts between different psychological types. It has been the ideal arena for the masters: dominant, selfish extraverts who have done everything to seize power and wealth. For many centuries, European history was dominated by kings and queens - privileged, elite families (the Old World Order) - doing everything they could to stay in power, frequently resorting to acts of the most terrifying brutality to maintain their influence. (Despite its many historical inaccuracies, the film Braveheart presents a credible portrayal of the struggle of an oppressed people and its brave leader against a grotesque and ruthless tyranny. Much of history followed this course. The history of the Illuminati has been the history of dominant, altruistic introverts trying to resist dominant, selfish extraverts. The submissives, whether extravert or introvert, have always followed the path of least resistance. They are the "slaves" in Hegel's master-slave dialectic, the "last men" to whom Nietzsche referred so derisively.)
The world's religions belong to distinct psychological types:
1) Islam is submissive ("Islam" means submission), altruistic and extraverted (when its "shadow" is triggered in times of crisis, it becomes dominant, selfish, introverted and paranoid, and hence its tendency to extreme violence.)
2) Catholicism is also submissive, altruistic and extraverted. But, in the past, Catholic popes were usually dominant, selfish extraverts, leading to huge tensions in the Church between the behaviour of its leaders and the Church's professed ethos. It was this tension that eventually led to the Protestant Reformation.
3) There are many Protestant sects and they come in all psychological flavours. (Anglicanism, to give one example, is submissive, altruistic and introverted. American evangelical movements, on the other hand, are dominant, selfish, extraverted and obsessed with money.) America, the land that has become the main home of the world's Power Elite, has almost always been ruled by WASPs - White Anglo Saxon Protestants, and they have usually been dominant, selfish extraverts, and amongst the most greedy and power-mad people the world has ever known. Ayn Rand's great "heroes" who went on strike against the world in Atlas Shrugged would have come from Protestant backgrounds, even if they later rejected religion.
4) Judaism is dominant, selfish and introverted. The Jews call themselves the "Chosen People" and claim a unique covenant with God. They have no desire for others to convert to Judaism and there are no Jewish missionaries.
5) Buddhism is submissive, altruistic and introverted. Buddhism is one of the least threatening religions in the world and some people might not even describe it as a religion at all but as a good, decent way of life.
6) Hinduism is submissive, altruistic and extraverted. Hinduism's great "sin", one for which it can never be forgiven, is its creation of the nauseating caste system, which can legitimately stake a claim to being the most repellent human institution ever devised, sentencing hundreds of millions to unspeakable suffering and degradation.
7) Sikhism is submissive, altruistic and introverted. The Sikhs have many positive attributes, but their adherence to the five Ks makes them as fanatical and off-putting as many of their rivals.
8) Gnosticism comes in two strains. The ascetic form is submissive, altruistic and introverted. The "Sin for Salvation" strain is dominant, altruistic and introverted. The Illuminati mostly belong to the second strain, but also see it as healthy to be able to periodically follow the ascetic path.
Advertising targets different types. We might enjoy some advertisements and be bored by others. For the ones that bore us, we can be sure that we are not the target audience; there will be some group out there lapping up those same ads. Advertisers are experts at pressing the right buttons. They are now beginning to pour research into neural advertising - trying to understand how our brains unconsciously react to images and messages. They seek to literally read our minds. Their "holy grail" is to bypass our conscious minds so that we become like automatons, craving whatever products they have implanted in our subconscious. This area is one that the Old World Order has put to the top of its agenda so as to better manipulate and control us.
The internet when it first began was strictly a domain for introverted thinkers. The advent of PCs, browsers and the world wide web led to an influx of other types. Social networking sites such as Facebook and YouTube now dominate the internet. These are perfect arenas for submissive sensing and feeling types.
Intuitive types on the internet frequently gravitate towards sites about conspiracy theories. Intuitive types are always thinking of future prospects, and they are happy to devote time to assembling hugely elaborate theories about the future of the world. This site is predominantly for this type of person. Thinkers would also be attracted to this site, but few sensing and feeling types would linger here.
Thinking types spend most of their time on science, mathematics and philosophical forums. They also like sites that debunk conspiracy theories. We are frequent targets of such people, not that we care in the slightest. We think it is healthy for thinkers to exert a skeptical and cynical influence over the internet. There are not nearly enough of them, unfortunately.
What is "political correctness"? It is a heavy-handed technique thought up by submissive, feeling extraverts to try to control dominants. Much of our modern culture is now infected by political correctness. If the politically correct had their way, this site would never exist due to the many radical, controversial and uncomplimentary sentiments expressed here. Politically correct people are a tremendous danger to freethinking and freedom of expression.
Submissive, altruistic extraverts prefer Macs while submissive, altruistic introverts prefer PCs.
The law is an arena where, in courtrooms, dominant, selfish extraverts rule the roost. How can such people ever dispense justice? In many nations, the system of justice is farcical and delivers anything but justice. The legal profession is full of greedy, unscrupulous, dominant extraverts. They are often remarkably similar to criminals. (The vast majority of criminals are poorly educated, dominant, selfish, sensing extraverts from deprived backgrounds.)
Even witnesses are problematic in legal terms. Imagine a violent fight erupting between six people outside a bar. Sensing types would be easily the best witnesses because they are much more attuned to accurately sucking in raw sensory data. Thinkers are too busy rationalising what is going on, intuitives with trying to work out the meaning and future consequences of the incident, and feeling types with being horrified and sickened by the violence.
Whether or not someone is convicted or freed is often completely down to the composition of the jury. The famous film Twelve Angry Man is about a dominant, altruistic introverted thinker intellectually defeating a dominant, selfish, extraverted feeling type. Most of the rest of that jury are a mixture of extraverted and introverted submissives who follow the leader.
The truth is that our even something as basic to a healthy society as good law is a complete lottery because it is shaped by dominant, selfish extraverts rather that dominant, altruistic introverts who would attempt to cater for the psychological issues raised here.
Any wealthy person is ipso facto of highly dubious moral character and is highly likely to be a dominant, selfish extravert. The human soul is not nurtured by money and materialism; in fact the opposite is true. So why are the rich so admired by so many people? It's about time that the rich and super rich were treated like pariahs. This is the message of The Last Bling King.
"If you want to know what God thinks of money, just look at the people he gave it to."
Dorothy Parker
Nations have psychological types. America, the main home of the Power Elite, is dominant, selfish and extraverted. The emblematic "American Dream" is about an individual rising from the gutter to the top of society i.e. it is a selfish, individualistic vision of personal dominance. The American Dream is certainly not about giving everyone in the country the best possible chance in life. In fact, it is the ultimate soul-destroying rat race. Hollywood, on the whole, makes cretinous movies with big bangs, blazing colours and state-of-the-art special effects (Star Wars etc) for sensing types; and cloying, sentimental drivel for feeling types (nearly all of Jennifer Anniston's films). There is precious little for thinkers and intuitives. American TV is even worse. It is a whole industry geared up for extraverted sensing and feeling types. It's all about extraverted performances and feelings (American Idol, Friends, Sex and the City etc).
"America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilisation in between."
Oscar Wilde
Modern Northern European countries tend to be dominant, altruistic, introverted nations. German, French and Dutch movies are much more thoughtful and artistic than Hollywood movies. Britain falls between the American and Northern European models and is therefore a complete mess.
Scandinavian countries, which are increasingly regarded as the best in the world according to a whole range of measures, are submissive, altruistic and introverted i.e. the opposite of America.
Southern European countries tend to be more extraverted than Northern European countries, perhaps because of the sunnier weather. Italian TV has become notorious for its vulgar crassness, and Spanish TV for its absurdly melodramatic soap operas.
Australia is a nation like America: extraverted and sensing, though it is also submissive because of its origins as a British penal colony. Australians are excellent at sport - possibly the best in the world - but their culture is non-existent.
Canada is submissive, altruistic and introverted: the opposite of it southern neighbour. Canadians are often mocked for being too "nice".
Mexico is submissive, altruistic and extraverted.
Japan and China are submissive, altruistic and introverted.
India is submissive, altruistic (but selfishness is on the increase) and extraverted.
Russia is submissive, altruistic and introverted. So was the old Soviet Union. The Cold War could easily be characterised as a standoff between two opposite psychological types. America won, ultimately, because it could outspend the Soviet Union. Many of the great conflicts of the world are actually best analysed on the basis of psychological conflicts. The First World War wasn't begun by the assassination of an Austrian archduke in Serbia, but by huge, arrogant, dominant, selfish powers all competing to be top dog and looking for any pretext to attack each other. The Second World War actually began in 1919 when Germany was humiliated by the Treaty of Versailles. Nothing was more certain than that the German shadow would emerge, and it did so spectacularly in the shape of Adolf Hitler. Osama Bin Laden is the embodiment of the Islamic shadow, the inescapable by-product of America's pro-Israeli foreign policy. 9/11 was inevitable because of the policies of successive American presidents, who were invariably anti-Islamic. The War on Terror could be ended at any moment by America withdrawing unconditional support from Israel and treating all Islamic nations with respect, but we all know none of that is ever going to happen.
These are all generalisations, of course, and certain countries are changing their traditional psychological type as they become much wealthier and more modern. China and India are certainly undergoing rapid change, though not necessarily for the better.
Families have personality types. The father and mother set the tone. The Old World Order families create offspring in their own image who are more than happy to follow the privileged family traditions. Many disputes between neighbours will almost certainly relate to differing psychological types. That's why ghettos are created: these are areas where people of similar psychological types and outlooks congregate and exclude others.
Schools are sausage factories, designed to squeeze out compliant submissives at the end of the production line. Schools should instead be dedicated to particular psychological types. There should be schools for thinkers (both extravert and introvert, or separated if that proves more successful), schools for feeling types, schools for sensing types and schools for intuitives. The thinkers and intuitives will be far higher achievers academically. The sensing types will enjoy sports and subjects that stimulate their senses. (Note that the vast majority of school bullies are dominant, extraverted sensing types. They are often not good academically and take out their frustrations by bullying others, especially submissive introverts. Many people's lives have been ruined because the "system" has failed to stop dominant, sensing extraverts picking on submissive introverts of all types.) "Friction" summer schools could be arranged where the different types come together for a couple of months to allow them get to know what the other types are like.
The Domination Agenda
Myers and Briggs added a new pairing to Jung's categories - judgment versus perception - and created the well-known 16 Myers-Briggs personality types. (The great American President and Illuminist Thomas Jefferson is thought to have been of the INTJ Myers-Briggs type. Most current members of the Illuminati belong to this type. Note that Jefferson died a poor man with many debts: how unlike the greedy presidents of today who are amongst the richest people in the world.)
We would introduce two further oppositions that deal with a person's relationships with others: is a person typically dominant or submissive towards others, and is he typically selfish or altruistic? This leads to a total of 64 possible types.
However, the War of the World - the true struggle between Satan and the True God - takes place between a small subset of these personality types.
The vast majority of those who are "Satanic" are a) dominant b) selfish and c) extravert. Of these, the ones who belong to the "sensing" category i.e. those most attuned to this world, the most materialistic, the ones who wallow in sensory experience and sensation seeking, are the worst of all. These are peculiarly superficial and soulless people. They form a major part of the Old World Order.
They are opposed by those who are a) dominant b) altruistic and c) introvert. Of these, the ones who belong to the "intuition" category i.e. those most attuned to future possibilities, those who look inwards and seek to be guided by their personal higher self, their divine spark, are the best of all. The Illuminati predominantly consist of this type.
The answer to why the world is wicked, evil, wretched, cruel and pitiless is simple. It is because the world is ruled by dominant, selfish, extravert pleasure-seekers. They care only about themselves. They don't feel for others. They don't think straight, and their intuition is extraordinarily primitive. They never look inwards. The question arises as to whether such people have souls at all. Imagine that the most terrible secret of the world is that people with souls are the slaves of those with no souls.
Submissive extraverts and altruistic extraverts are not a problem. Dominant, selfish introverts can be: they are susceptible to being seduced and corrupted by Satanic forces.
Most people in the world are submissive. They will back down when they come up against dominants. They don't like conflict, flee from trouble and don't like to resist. In terms of David Riesman's classifications in The Lonely Crowd, submissives tend to belong to the "other-directed" and "tradition-directed" types. A few dominants in these groups lead the others. The people resemble flocks of sheep or herds of cows. Most dominants come from Riesman's "inner-directed" type.
All it takes for the world to become toxic is for a few dominant, selfish people to assume the main positions of power. That is exactly what the Old World Order is: 6,000 dominant, selfish extraverts, mostly of the sensing and intuitive types. The submissives are too scared to fight back. Only groups like the Illuminati - composed of dominant, altruistic introverts - have the courage to resist.
Extraverts are far worldlier than introverts, far better at dealing with people in every day situations. That's why dominant, selfish extraverts run the world and dominant, altruistic introverts don't. But a world ruled by dominant, altruistic introverts would be a paradise for humanity. In the future envisaged by Star Trek, there are no dominant, selfish extraverts in positions of power. Captain Kirk is dominant and extravert, but fundamentally altruistic. Dr McCoy is submissive, extravert and altruistic. Spock is a dominant, altruistic introvert whose dominance is often rendered submissive by virtue of the fact that he's an alien outsider. The Federation itself is dominant, altruistic and introverted (like Spock), but it doesn't like to overtly dominate or interfere with others (the Prime Directive). The enemies in Star Trek are frequently dominant, selfish and extraverted. In The Next Generation, Captain Picard is a dominant, altruistic introvert. Commander Riker is dominant, extraverted and altruistic. Commander Data is equivalent to Spock. Their ultimate tormentor enemy is "Q" - a dominant, extraverted, selfish narcissist. Q is an emblem of the Old World Order.
So, the world is a very small place in terms of who runs it: just a few thousand people. Such is their dominance that the vast majority readily submit to their will. The world is shaped according to their personal values: absolute selfishness, self-love and greed. These people are the true obstacles to a better world. This hell that we live in can be attributed entirely to a few people belonging to certain well-defined personality types. Isn't that remarkable?
The Illuminati's plan is simple: to bring together all of the world's dominant, altruistic, introverted thinkers and intuitives - the world's true intellectual elite - under a single banner dedicated to using their intelligence to rid the world of the tyranny of dominant, selfish extraverts.
In Ayn Rand's vile book Atlas Shrugged, the dominant, selfish extraverts go on strike to show the world how much the masses need them. In fact, no one needs them. If they had gone on strike as Rand envisaged, the dominant, altruistic introverts would have assumed control and rapidly brought about their utopian Star Trek vision. There would be no way back for Rand's pathetic and nauseating gang of egomaniacal tyrants.
Are you bold enough for the challenge? What can you bring to the party? Are you one of us - a smart, dominant, altruistic introvert? Then become part of the crusade to remove the Old World Order from their pedestals. We have the intellectual and moral high ground. We have all the best ideas. We have a great and noble vision for humanity. What we don't have is the ear of the masses. How can we seduce them to our side, to remove the scales from their eyes and let them see reality at long last?
We are living in the Matrix. Most people are dreaming. We need to wake them up. If we went on strike like Rand's "elite", or if we had never existed, the world would be deprived of all of its greatest and most profound thinkers, all of its mystics and visionaries, all of its great rebels, revolutionaries and radicals, its great artists, poets and writers. We are the soul of the human race. Without us, humans are little more than apes. We are the ones who have intuitive contact with our higher selves, with the divine spark, the soul. We are the ones closest to God. It is we who are becoming God. The rest are far, far behind. But that is no reason for us to be proud, arrogant, egotistical or elitist. We are of both sexes, of all races and colours. We are from all parts of the world, and all family and religious backgrounds. The human spirit is strongest in us. It is our divine mission to help others, to bring them forward, to raise the consciousness of the whole of humanity, to point it towards the divine.
What will you do to help the cause? What will you contribute? Why not become part of the Movement that we described in another article on this site and do your bit for the cause? Use your brilliance to change the world. If we all work together, nothing can stop us.
The Psychopathic World
Beyond Jung and Myers-Briggs, there are many other psychological systems to consider.
William Sheldon speculated that body types play a critical role in people's personalities. "Endomorphs" are round and tubby, "ectomorphs" are tall and skinny and "mesomorphs" are muscular and athletic. Endomorphs tend to be sociable. They like to relax, eat and drink. They're mostly extraverted. Ectomorphs are restrained, uptight, self-aware and intelligent. They're mostly introverted. Mesomorphs are assertive, action-oriented and mostly extraverted. They tend to be more dominant than the other two types. Intelligent mesomorphs tend to be dominant introverts. Unintelligent mesomorphs - "Jocks" - tend to be dominant extraverts. Many members of the Old World Order are rich, privileged "Jocks". George W Bush is of that type.
According to Hippocrates, "sanguine" people are sociable and fun-loving, "choleric" types are energetic, ambitious and dominant, "melancholic" people are thoughtful and creative but prone to depression, "phlegmatic" types are kind, loyal, reserved and make good friends.
In the Enneagram system favoured by the likes of Pythagoras, there are nine types of people:
1: The Reformer, 2: The Helper, 3: The Motivator, 4: The Romantic, 5: The Thinker, 6: The Skeptic, 7: The Enthusiast, 8: The Leader, 9: The Peacemaker.
In the Belbin system, there are again nine types:
1: The Plant (ideas person), 2: Resource Investigator (looks around for anything that will prove useful), 3: The Coordinator, 4: The Shaper (task leader), 5: The Monitor Evaluator (provide a well-balanced viewpoint), 6: Teamworker, 7: Implementer, 8: Completer Finisher, 9: Specialist.
Type A and B theory says that Type A people are impatient, driven, ambitious people prone to heart attacks. Type B's are chilled out, relaxed, but not ambitious and tend not to achieve highly.
The "Big Five" model says that people can be classified according to different weightings of the following traits:
1. Openness to experience
2. Conscientiousness
3. Extraversion
4. Agreeableness
5. Neuroticism
All of these systems (and there are several more that we haven't mentioned) contain valuable truths, but they are never properly utilised. Companies tell employees about Belbin teams then never take a single practical step to actually set up Belbin teams. Governments never use any of these theories to shape policy and bring about a psychologically harmonious society.
Imagine a system in which everyone's personality was identified early on and carefully nurtured using these theories. Imagine everyone having their potential maximised; being surrounded by people on the same wavelength and kept away from those with an entirely different psychological perspective. Imagine a society where people had far more friends and far fewer enemies. That's the society we can build, based on psychology rather than economics, on ideas rather than money, on happiness rather than status, on giving everyone the best possible chance, rather than the elite few a guaranteed life of success and excess. We can separate natural-born enemies and reduce conflict and tension, bring together natural-born allies and create harmony and friendship. We can move from the Society of Mammon to the Society of Maximised Mind.
The ancient Greeks said Know Thyself. The world's main problem is that it does not know itself and there are those who don't want it to know itself because they prosper from its ignorance.
Here is wisdom. Every problem in the world is psychological. The reason why the earth is so cruel, wretched and depraved is that is being deliberately run according to psychopathic values. It is governed by the Shadow and the Persona rather the Ego and the Self (in Jungian terms); by the Id and the Pleasure Principle rather the Ego, Reality principle and Superego (in Freudian terms).
The people in charge of the world are psychopaths. They project their psychopathy onto others. Corporations are psychopathic. All the main institutions of the world are psychopathic; central banks, armies, police forces, parliaments, senates, supreme courts, high courts, the media. The Catholic Church says it cares for the poor yet the Vatican is one of the richest places on earth - a psychopathic contradiction. Islam claims to be about peace and submission yet its prophet, Mohammed, was a soldier who personally ordered and watched the deaths of hundreds, and whose followers in the present age are characterised in many people's minds by the horrors of suicide bombing - a psychopathic contradiction. Orthodox Jews proclaim the glory of "God" and yet look like the most dismal, grim, joyless fanatics on earth - a psychopathic contradiction. The Hindu religion supports the Caste system - one of the most psychopathic human institutions ever devised, whereby the "untouchables" are deemed fit only for cleaning toilets and eating rats.
"Royal" families live under the psychotic delusion that they are special and beloved of God. As if. Only Satan loves royalty. Celebrity culture is psychopathic. The super rich are psychopathic. The division of wealth in the world is psychopathic. History has more often than not been the record of the progression of human psychopathy. No one in their right mind, if they were starting from scratch, would design the world the way it is now - racist, sexist, divided, full of hatred, conflict, unequal wealth and resources. Does the present world not meet all the criteria of a world created by Satan, the ultimate psychopath? He and his archons stand behind the worst of humanity's psychopaths - the Old World Order, the Power Elite. They have constructed an entire system of psychopathic rules that enrich them and allow them to indulge every whim, while sentencing the rest of humanity to soul-destroying, meaningless lives.
The ancient Gnostic portrayed the world as a prison planet. In fact, it is more accurately described as a mental asylum. The vast majority of people are having breakdowns. The world is mentally ill. It is repressed, in denial, regressing to infantilism. The world needs therapy. It needs to lie on the psychiatrist's chair and confront its problems. It is attracted to everything that is most harmful to it. It is out of balance, baffled, bewildered, full of toxins, neuroses and psychoses, having daily nightmares.
Yet we already know the answers to all of this psychosis and psychopathy. The only thing preventing the cure is the fact that the psychopaths are in charge and don't want to be cured. No psychopath in history has ever thought he had a problem. So, how shall we stop the psychopaths and run the world according to rational, psychological rules that promote the health and happiness of the whole of humanity? The Star Trek society is one where human beings have learned to rid themselves of their psychopathic heritage. Their world is rational, sane, balanced and harmonious, everything our world is not.
Don't we deserve to escape from the asylum? The time has come for us to liberate ourselves. We have the answers. Psychology is the key to the next stage of the world's evolution. We just need to apply our minds. And when we have accomplished that, we can focus on the most important task of all: the salvation of our souls.
Addendum
A contributor emailed us with the following points:
Everybody's education should involve learning the eight different psychological types so that they know them in their sleep. That way there is a greater chance that different personalities can cooperate although they are entirely different, even opposites, once their education is completed and work starts.
Otherwise, to isolate the different psychological types while educating them, so that they can learn without interruption from disruptive psychological types and those on different wavelengths, sounds like a basically good idea, but could still be a potential problem. All these groups have been sitting on "different islands", figuratively speaking, and now they have to mingle with society. Without an in depth knowledge of psychology and the different psychological types, society would probably fall back into old patterns.
These are astute comments and well worth addressing. Our point is that if it turns out that certain psychological types are strictly incompatible and always likely to misunderstand, dislike and become embroiled in conflict with each other then it's best to keep them apart as much as possible (voluntarily) for their own good and the good of society. However, as our contributor has said, if it turns out that by educating people about psychological types to the extent that these become internalised and people can readily see what type of person they’re dealing with and know exactly how to approach and interact with that person so as to minimise misunderstandings and conflict then, of course, that solves the problem.
If, through a proper psychological education of the type we are currently denied by our production line schools, we can empathise much more successfully with others and understand why they are behaving in ways that irritate us then our irritation will be defused and we will get on much better, and society will be much healthier. Psychology should become the bedrock of education, society and the law for the simple reason that it's all about understanding people’s behaviour, and the better we understand each other, the more effectively we can construct a society that cultivates the potential of all rather than simply serving the needs of the Power Elite.
Society should take an interest in the psychological nature of each and every person in order to create the conditions that allow each person to flourish. At the moment, no nation on earth knows a single thing about the psychological nature of its citizens. How then could any of them possibly offer policies that will increase the psychological well-being and contentment of the citizens? The truth is that no nation cares because each one is too busy catering for its Power Elite and has little interest in anyone else other than as cannon fodder, faceless workers and zombie consumers.
Meritocracy is not dogmatic. It is intended to employ a core approach akin to the scientific method i.e. hypotheses are proposed and then tested. If they are successful then they are retained and refined to make them even better; if they fail then they're rejected and something else is tried.
This is an evidence-based approach rather than a “moral” approach. For example, there are plenty of moralists denouncing any attempt to legalise drugs. The meritocratic approach would highlight the biggest single piece of evidence ever collected in this context. Between 1919 and 1933, America conducted the “Noble Experiment”, better known as Prohibition, at the instigation of the moralistic temperance movement. America made the sale of the world’s most widely used drug – alcohol – illegal. The result was a disaster. It led to drinking dens and speakeasies, it criminalized many ordinary citizens and it gave a rocket boost to gangsterism. Prohibition failed then and is failing now in terms of other drugs. Moralists can't be allowed to impose their narrow vision on everyone else.
Drugs should be legalised, allowing them to be manufactured by drugs companies and ensuring proper quality control and consistency of product – unlike the current mess where no one can be sure what they're getting when they take illegal drugs. Gangsters would be put out of business, the “underground” illegal economy would be smashed, and the drugs would be taxed like alcohol and cigarettes to benefit taxpayers. If, after ten years, legalisation of drugs had led to serious consequences then the policy would be abandoned and something else tried. The important point is that evidence – not moralists – should be used to decide policy.
What we have put forward here are suggestions and hypotheses. We are happy for people to debate them, challenge them, suggest refinements and improvements. That is how proper government should be conducted, not by a privileged elite in Washington D.C. preaching to everyone else about “right” and “wrong”. We already know what they think is right – anything that puts more money in their pockets; and "wrong" – anything that challenges their dominance.
More and more people are seeing through their lies and their self-serving propaganda. Keep spreading the word. One day, the privileged elite will wake up and make the horrific discovery that no one is listening any longer.