Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz: July 1, 1646 – November 14, 1716
“Without mathematics we cannot penetrate deeply into philosophy. Without philosophy we cannot penetrate deeply into mathematics. Without both we cannot penetrate deeply into anything.” – Leibniz
"Only geometry can hand us the thread [which will lead us through] the labyrinth of the continuum’s composition, the maximum and the minimum, the infinitesimal and the infinite; and no one will arrive at a truly solid metaphysic except he who has passed through this [labyrinth]." - Leibniz
Transcend your experiences. Reason is the sole path to transcendence, and thus to Truth.
The Ode to Joy
"It is the natural tendency of the ignorant to believe what is not true." - H. L. Mencken
As a matter of simple logic, the answer to existence is either rational or irrational. If the answer is rational then there can only be one such answer since it would be irrational for rational answers to contradict each other. Therefore, the rational answer must be consistent and complete, and that necessitates that the rational answer must be a single principle (since a single principle cannot be incomplete and inconsistent with respect to itself). The principle in question is of course the principle of sufficient reason, and this principle is expressed ontologically through the God Equation (Euler's Formula), which defines ontological mathematics. In the past, the God Equation, the rational explanation for everything, was anthropomorphised and turned into a Super Being called "God".
Hence, we can definitively state that there is only one rational answer to existence, while there as many irrational answers to existence as there are irrational people. Of course, irrational "answers" are not answers at all. Nothing irrational can be an answer to anything real.
So, you have two choices: accept the rational Truth (one answer), or the irrational Lie (as many answers as there are liars). The Lie is relative and fallible. The Truth is absolute and infallible. Anyone who tells you that everyone has their own truth is a liar. People certainly have their own lies, but not their own Truth. If you want to be a Liar, and believe Lies, that's entirely your choice.
Nietzsche wrote, "The falseness of a judgment is to us not necessarily an objection to a judgment: it is here that our new language perhaps sounds strangest. The question is to what extent it is life-advancing, life-preserving, species-preserving, perhaps even species-breeding; and our fundamental tendency is to assert that the falsest judgments are the most indispensable to us … that to renounce false judgments would be to renounce life, would be to deny life. To recognise untruth as a condition of life: that, to be sure, means to resist customary value-sentiments in a dangerous fashion; and a philosophy which ventures to do so places itself, by that act alone, beyond good and evil."
This gets to the heart of the matter. People believe lies because they find them much more useful in terms of Will to Power (hence life) than the Truth.
Only a tiny percentage of humanity (around 5-10%) are rational, and only they associate their Will to Power with the Truth. Everyone else wants to believe whatever Lie makes their life easiest for them. Why do Christians believe in absurd stories revolving around a Jewish rabbi called Yehoshua ben Yosef (aka Jesus Christ)? It's because it makes them feel good. They get a childish Mythos that allows them to understand reality in a childish, easy way. Of course, the fact that the Christian Mythos has nothing to do with reality is neither here nor there. Perception is reality, as the relativists like to say.
People love Mythos and hate Logos. They embrace the Lie with a passion, and they are repelled by the Truth. That's the human condition. We can hardly be surprised that our work is so reviled given that we are promoting the Truth of reality that is incomprehensible to up to 95% of the human race (including many of the people who have shown an interest in Illuminism).
You can choose to accept a mystical, emotional, sensory, or rational answer to existence. Eastern religion goes for the irrational mystical option (it's all about absorption into a mysterious "Oneness" via meditation), Abrahamism goes for the irrational emotional option (it's all about a personal relationship with "God" via prayer), and science goes for the irrational sensory option (it's all about the total denial of anything non-sensory, such as the mind itself, via sensory experiments). Only ontological mathematics is about reason and logic.
We don't expect you to agree with us. In fact, we expect you to disagree with us. Nothing in human history has been more ferociously resisted than the Truth, and nothing has been more fanatically supported than the False Truth (the Lie). So it goes. That's humanity for you. It always preferred the False God (the Demiurge, the Devil) to the True God (the God Equation).
Humanity is a Mythos Species, not a Logos species. It loves the Lie and hates the Truth. Humanity's problems will be solved only when this is reversed ... when all Mythos (mainstream) religions die, when "God" dies, and when atheistic scientific materialism dies.
Paint it Dead
No scientist on earth can provide a rational, logical justification for why scientific empiricism and materialism should be chosen over scientific rationalism and idealism. Indeed, the unexplained presence of rationalist mathematics at the heart of science completely contradicts the philosophy of David Hume, the greatest empiricist of them all.
Hume said that "impressions" are our perceptions of the world, while "ideas" are images of impressions, formed in thinking and reasoning. Thus we can have no idea of anything of which we have received no impression. This is the core doctrine of empiricism. You cannot then appeal to ideas (derived from impressions) to explain impressions. Yet this is exactly what science does. It relies on the ideas of mathematics to account for the impressions (empirical data). Remove math (ideas) from science - a step which you are obliged to take if you are a true empiricist like David Hume - and you then have no means to explain the empirical data, hence, like Hume, you must become a total skeptic, someone who denies any possibility of authentic knowledge.
Science is based on circular logic. It says that impressions come first and then ideas. If this were the case, you would have no right to use ideas to explain impressions, and this would leave you with no means at all to account for impressions. They would just be "givens", without any possibility of explanation. That was exactly the position Hume arrived at.
Kant responded to Hume by creating a set of twelve a priori categories of the understanding and two pure intuitions - space and time - to form a basic conceptual apparatus in the mind for making sense of the world. However, these were like rabbits pulled out of a magic hat... Kant could do nothing to explain why minds were like this, and, in effect, basically claimed that "God" created minds this way, which is to explain nothing.
The only way to overcome Hume's deadly logic is to invert his system, i.e. to switch from empiricism to rationalism. With rationalism, ideas come first and then impressions are attached to them. Rationalism concerns the forms of things, while empiricism concerns their content. We first of all establish a theory of form (mathematics), and then we account for our impressions (empirical content) with regard to that rational theory.
Thus we have a rational and logical explanatory framework for all impressions. If you reject form, as Hume did, and base everything on content, you have left yourself without any means to place content in a theoretical, explicatory framework. Hume was willing to do exactly this. Science wasn't.
Despite calling itself empiricist, science fraudulently uses rationalist mathematics to provide a theoretical, explicatory framework for all scientific data. It has thus become rationalist by the back door. Science is pseudo-rationalism, masquerading as empiricism. What's worse, it compounds its dishonesty and lack of intellectual integrity in two ways:
1) Despite recognising that scientific data must be placed in a mathematical explicatory framework, science refuses to do this completely and consistently. It subjects mathematics to its empiricist philosophy and thus produces a subset of mathematics based on real numbers. Imaginary numbers, complex numbers, zero and infinity are all banned from appearing in the output of "scientific" mathematics (i.e. empiricist mathematics). Even negative real numbers are barely tolerated. Bizarrely, and inexplicably, science has no problem with using complex numbers during calculations, provided they are eliminated by the end of the calculations. This is an absurdity. If complex numbers are not things related to reality, how can they appear in mathematical operations purporting to tell us about reality? This is like using elves to make your shoes, and then denying that elves exist... in which case you must have made the shoes yourself, even though you know you didn't (!).
Of course, all of these problems can be resolved at one stroke. If mathematics is not an unreal, manmade abstraction, but in fact the language of existence itself - the language that defines reality and nature - then we can indeed validly use mathematics to explain empirical data. In fact, we can't use anything else. Moreover, we must use all of mathematics, and not just those parts (real numbers) that scientists like. Ontological mathematics does exactly this.
Only ontological mathematics can actually explain reality. That's because it recognises mathematics as real, not unreal. Only real math can explain real reality. Unreal math can only explain "unreal reality", and that's not to explain anything at all. Science is exactly this... the "explanation" of "unreal reality".
Everyone has been overwhelmed by the success of science. What none of these people has grasped is that it's mathematics that is 100% responsible for science's perceived success, and if we simply got rid of science and replaced it with ontological mathematics, we would enjoy infinitely more success... sufficient to transform us into the masters of earth, the masters of nature, the masters of the universe... Gods!
Voice: "This is not a dream... not a dream. We are using your brain's electrical system as a receiver. We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference. You are receiving this broadcast as a dream. We are transmitting from the year one, nine, nine, nine. You are receiving this broadcast in order to alter the events you are seeing. Our technology has not developed a transmitter strong enough to reach your conscious state of awareness, but this is not a dream. You are seeing what is actually occurring for the purpose of causality violation." (Prince of Darkness, John Carpenter, 1987)
What scientists fundamentally deny is the existence of an eternal, necessary, analytic, logical, rational, intelligible order, which underlies everything, and produces, at the Big Bang, the temporal, contingent world of science. Scientists deny it for the most pathetic of all reasons ... they mistake it for "God". It is in fact Mathematics. Beneath the world of scientific experiments is a permanent mathematical order, invisible to the human senses (just as "God" was always deemed invisible). Mathworld isn't invisible for any "spooky" reason, but thanks to pure logic. Mathworld is the rational information carrier, and the information it carries is what constitutes the empirical world, i.e. the empirical content (information carried) is visible to us, while the rational form (information carrier) is not. As a matter of simple logic, noumenal form and phenomenal content can't both be available to our senses. The mathematical order provides the fibre and fabric of existence. All information - all the stuff of empirical experience - is conveyed via it, and is impossible without it. There are no freestanding experiences, not grounded in rationalist mathematics.
These monadic minds are both objects and subjects. As mathematical objects, they engage in interactions dictated by mathematical laws, and these objective interactions produce the ordered, patterned world studied by scientists. However, as subjects, they are entities that can experience themselves and the world, and exhibit free will. They are self-optimising and self-solving, forever seeking the answer to themselves, and undergoing a vast dialectical journey to get to the solution - the meaning - of their existence. They make this cosmic journey in conjunction with all other souls. This makes them religious and spiritual beings, imbued with purpose.
Science offers the worst explanation of ultimate reality ever furnished by the human mind, one wholly cut off from the principle of sufficient reason (which demands and ensures that everything must have an exact reason for why it happens). To claim that things can happen without reasons - as science does - is to enter a mystical, irrational world of unreason and illogic, which is rather like a world defined by a bizarre, autistic religious cult (!).
All of this can be cured at a stroke, by underpinning science with mathematics. Imagine removing mathematics from science. What would be left? - divination! Imagine Newton's laws of motion without mathematics. They would be just a bunch of guesses and speculations, based on long lists of observations. All of the most brilliant observations and experiments conceivable would amount to nothing without mathematics to make sense of them all. Science has never grasped that it's mathematics, and not observations and experiments, that's responsible for science's success. Science before the introduction of mathematics was alchemy!
Illuminism, grounded in ontological mathematics, defined by Euler's Formula, furnishes the world's only Logos religion, one based on reason and logic, and rejecting all prophets, popes, priests, gurus, messiahs, holy books, sacred scriptures, and divine revelations that characterise the Mythos religions of the world.
Illuminism asserts that there is only one path, and one answer to existence. That answer is mathematics ... and anyone in the world can work out the answer if they are rational, logical and intelligent enough.
If you want the answer to your existence, math is the only thing that can give it to you. Leibniz, in his Monadology, provided the blueprint of fundamental, ultimate existence three hundred years ago. Ontological mathematics has turned this into an entirely mathematical system rather than a merely philosophical system. It has defined the mind via the most powerful analytic formula in mathematics (Euler's Formula), and can thus put mind at the root of matter (rather than claiming, as science absurdly does, that mindless matter can miraculously create mind, and lifeless matter can magically create life).
Illuminism, the secret religion, the Logos religion, rationally promises that everyone will become a God ... thanks to mathematics. The sooner humanity gets on board with ontological mathematics, the sooner we shall all become Gods, and create heaven for ourselves.
It's impossible for Mythos religions to rationally explain reality. It's equally impossible for empiricist science to rationally explain reality (the ultimate answer is obviously not something you can see, or in any way detect with your human senses; if science could produce a "final theory of everything", it would of course be written as a mathematical equation!). Only one thing can rationally explain existence: reason itself - a wholly non-sensory entity - which is expressed ontologically as mathematics, derived entirely from the principle of sufficient reason, and enshrined in a single complete and consistent cosmic master formula.
This is the Gospel of the Illuminati.
"In content, [Leibniz's] philosophy was largely an updating of the Pythagorean and Platonic traditions, using the concepts of Aristotelian scholasticism." - George MacDonald Ross
"All things are numbers; number rules all." - Pythagoras, Grand Master of the Illuminati.
The War On Reason
Everywhere, reason is under assault. Islam is the primary vector of unreason in today's world, but irrationalist attitudes and forces are being cultivated everywhere. All people who are ruled by faith, their subjective experiences, their senses, their mystical intuitions, are lined up against reason and logic. All the people who promote relativism, Mythos, subjectivity, solipsism, narcissism, political correctness, and so on, refuse to respect rationalism.
The diabolical massacre in Paris on Friday, 13th November shows exactly what a world of unreason is like. The only antidote is a Logos world of rational people who obey reason and logic rather than absurd ancient belief systems. The world is getting madder, not saner, and that's because people despise reason, and campaign against it in favour of whatever makes them feel good about themselves. Why does anyone today subscribe to irrational beliefs that were formulated thousands of years ago? These people have failed to evolve. If you turn your back on philosophy and mathematics, you are not wise and spiritual, you're a moron! All the rational people in the world have to disengage from the hordes of irrationalists who believe anything other than the Truth. The people of reason must construct the New World. Those locked into ancient, refuted beliefs certainly won't be liberating the human race from the chains of the past. How can anyone imagine that prayer and meditation can be the answer to anything? Reason and logic are the basis of human progress. Everything else is obstructing human advancement.
There can be no place in Illuminism for Muslims, Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, Taoists and New Agers. These people have insisted on opposing reason, and sustaining ancient faiths that have long since been rendered absurd by science, philosophy and mathematics. If you're not rational enough to see that mathematics is the essence of rationalism, and that humanity must turn to mathematics in order to be rational, then you yourself are part of the irrationalist army blocking human evolution.
H. L. Mencken said, "...it is not sufficient to exhibit the true; it is also necessary to expose and denounce the false. To admit that the false has any standing in court, that it ought to be handled gently because millions of morons cherish it and thousands of quacks make their livings propagating it - to admit this, as the more fatuous of the reconcilers of science and religion inevitably do, is to abandon a just cause to its enemies, cravenly and without excuse."
Political correctness is the ideology that we should not attack the causes that "millions of morons cherish". The Paris slaughterhouse is the inevitable product of that policy.
"Radicalization" is irrationalization. As long as the world panders to absurd beliefs that turn humans into mass murderers to please an invisible God invented in the deranged imagination of stupid people, humanity will never be free, and will never be sane.
Irrationalism ensures that our world is hell. Only rationalism can make it heaven.
Faith and Mythos are unacceptable. They make people "think" with their emotions and self-delusions, not with their reason and logic. Relativism panders to this epidemic of irrationalism by telling everyone that their own experiences are the "Truth". This is an absolute Lie. It's the formula for insanity.
The Paris atrocity is symptomatic of a world that prays to the Lie, and tramples on the Truth. Why do people hate Math? Because there you have the Truth in its unadulterated purity. Math - the Truth - is the least human thing you can get, and therefore is the thing most shunned by the human race. The Lie, on the other hand, is the most human thing you can get, the quintessence of humanity. Humanity loves the Lie ... the story, the self-serving delusion, the crazy belief, the self-propaganda, whatever a person can sell to himself as increasing his power, and making him feel good about himself.
It's Reason or the Paris bloodbath repeated over and over again. Humanity will become extinct if it keeps rejecting the Truth. The Lie can only end in annihilation. It's dialectically inevitable.
Reason can end the carnage ... reason taught from Day One in everyone's lives. Faith and Mythos must be stopped from infecting impressionable young minds. They are the deadliest disease on earth.
Faith is never acceptable under any circumstances. Mythos can be justified solely if it leads to Logos - to reason, logic, philosophy, mathematics, knowledge, understanding and Truth.
"The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant." - Maximilien Robespierre
"It is time that we labored for the happiness of the people. Legislators who are to bring light and order into the world must pursue their course with inexorable tread, fearless and unswerving as the sun." - Louis Antoine de Saint-Just
"I think, therefore I am." - Descartes
"The Enlightenment was a philosophical movement which dominated the world of ideas in Europe in the 18th century. ... The most influential publication of the Enlightenment was the Encyclopédie, compiled by Denis Diderot and (until 1759) by Jean le Rond d'Alembert and a team of 150 scientists and philosophers. It was published between 1751 and 1772 in thirty-five volumes, and spread the ideas of the Enlightenment across Europe and beyond. ... In the mid-18th century, Paris became the center of an explosion of philosophic and scientific activity challenging traditional doctrines and dogmas. The philosophic movement was led by Voltaire and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, who argued for a society based upon reason rather than faith and Catholic doctrine, for a new civil order based on natural law, and for science based on experiments and observation. The political philosopher Montesquieu introduced the idea of a separation of powers in a government, a concept which was enthusiastically adopted by the authors of the United States Constitution. While the Philosophes of the French Enlightenment were not revolutionaries, and many were members of the nobility, their ideas played an important part in undermining the legitimacy of the Old Regime and shaping the French Revolution. There were two distinct lines of Enlightenment thought: the radical enlightenment, inspired by the philosophy of Spinoza, advocating democracy, individual liberty, freedom of expression, and eradication of religious authority; and a second, more moderate variety, supported by Descartes, Locke, Christian Wolff, Isaac Newton and others, which sought accommodation between reform and the traditional systems of power and faith. Both lines of thought were opposed by the conservative Counter-Enlightenment." - Wikipedia
Why do the forces of Unreason hate France and Paris so much? Because that's where the rational Enlightenment was born, and where the glorious French Revolution ushered in the Modern World by putting the first lethal dent in the Ancien Régime (the Old World Order), the world ruled by faith, heredity and privilege.
Mecca and Jerusalem are the epicentres of Unreason, of conservative Counter-Enlightenment. Nothing but poison and madness flow from these Satanic cities. They are terrestrial mental asylums.
The world desperately needs a second and final Enlightenment. We need a definitive Age of Reason ... the Age of Ontological Mathematics. Mecca and Jerusalem must fall. We need to build Golgonooza (William Blake's city of Imagination, Art and Science), and Logopolis, the city of Reason, Logic and Mathematics.
Sapere Aude ("Dare to Know"): the motto of the Enlightenment.
The Grail Knights
"It is a lonely life, the way of the necromancer... oh, yes. Lacrimae Mundi - the tears of the world." - Merlin, Excalibur
"Alone among the Twelve Olympians, Apollo was venerated among the Hyperboreans, the Hellenes thought: he spent his winter amongst them. For their part the Hyperboreans sent mysterious gifts, packed in straw, which came first to Dodona and then were passed from tribe to tribe until they came to Apollo's temple on Delos (Pausanias). Abaris, Hyperborean priest of Apollo, was a legendary wandering healer and seer. Theseus visited the Hyperboreans, and Pindar transferred Perseus's encounter with Medusa there from its traditional site in Libya, to the dissatisfaction of his Alexandrian editors. Along with Thule, Hyperborea was one of several terrae incognitae to the Greeks and Romans, where Pliny, Pindar and Herodotus, as well as Virgil and Cicero, reported that people lived to the age of one thousand and enjoyed lives of complete happiness.... Also, the sun was supposed to rise and set only once a year in Hyperborea; which would place it above or upon the Arctic Circle, or, more generally, in the arctic polar regions. The ancient Greek writer Theopompus in his work Philippica claimed Hyperborea was once planned to be conquered by a large race of soldiers from another island (some have claimed this was Atlantis), the plan though was abandoned because the soldiers from Meropis realized the Hyperboreans were too strong for them and the most blessed of people..." - Wikipedia
Only math can take you to Hyperborea.
"Neither by land nor by sea shalt thou find the road to the Hyperboreans." - Pindar