Bush attempted to do the same thing in Iraq. (Most of the money that was pumped into the Iraqi economy ended up in the hands of wealthy, corporate friends of Bush and Cheney.) He failed because Shia Islam is resistant to the OWO. A different type of tyranny applies - that of the black-clad ayatollahs and imams.
The Iranian people (Shia Muslims) overthrew the OWO in the shape of the Shah of Iran. The Shia Iraqis tried to overthrow Saddam Hussein (a Sunni Muslim), but were betrayed by the west. People tend to forget how popular Saddam Hussein once was with the American government in the years when he was fighting Iran. By the same token, the Afghani insurgents - the future Taliban - and Osama bin Laden were allies of America during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. Unlike the Shia Muslims, Sunni Muslims are far more disposed to the OWO. Look at the corrupt Saudi Royal Family. Look at the luxury shopping malls and opulent hotels in countries like Dubai.
Fukuyama's thesis was that the end of Communism would lead to the whole world adopting the western political and economic model. America would lead and everyone else would follow. There would be no more conflict. History, in the sense of great ideological struggles, would have come to an end. Western democratic market capitalism - the OWO's power base - would be triumphant everywhere. The OWO would rule the whole world in the way they have always desired. There is no "New World Order"; simply the Old World Order extended to its fullest limit.